Jump to content
IGNORED

How Useful Was Your Fitting?


Note: This thread is 1521 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

What have you gained from a fitting?  

15 members have voted

  1. 1. What did you gain from your CLUB fitting? Choose all that apply.

    • I gained more than 10 yards!
      3
    • I gained a bit of distance.
      0
    • Fun/educational experience but my clubs were already fine.
      4
    • Nothing. Waste of time/money...
      2
    • Other
      6
  2. 2. What did you gain from your BALL fitting? Choose all that apply.

    • Plenty. Of course my handicap has a "+" in it.
      0
    • Something. Ball fitting is not just manufacturers trying to squeeze desperate golfers after all.
      0
    • Nothing. Waste of time/money.
      3
    • Ball fitting is a thing?
      3
    • Other
      9


Recommended Posts

ChetlovesMer brings up a good point here:

Since we only seem to be getting information from people with a financial stake in it, I would be interested to get some data from another (admittedly completely unscientific) source.

How helpful was your fitting?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

Don’t love the poll. Fitting is about more than distance gains.

Fittings with a good fitter are well worth the money for most golfers.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 minutes ago, iacas said:

Don’t love the poll. Fitting is about more than distance gains.

Fittings with a good fitter are well worth the money for most golfers.

Yeah I was thinking the same thing.  Could be a poll where “ other” is the winner.  FYI, I didn’t vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 minutes ago, iacas said:

Don’t love the poll. Fitting is about more than distance gains.

Fittings with a good fitter are well worth the money for most golfers.

Then the positive options should simply garner more support.  Alternatively, how would you word the poll?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think this is a tough question.

3 things:

Firstly, Far too many folks just talk about distance. Which might be fine if you are being fit for a driver. A good iron fitter will discuss things like gapping, set make up, dispersion, and more. 

Secondly, I go to a fitter that I like and trust. He's done my last iron, and my last 2 driver fittings. @iacas did my last (and only) putter fitting. I like this guy because he will literally give me the best overall option. AND the best option with NO upcharge. Personally, I think that's really cool. Sometimes they may be the same option, other times the difference is so small you will never notice it out on the course. 

Lastly, I find it silly that fitters make ridiculous claims. I've seen adds in magazines where they mention that after a fitting the average player drops 7 strokes or 10 strokes or what ever. In my mind, that is as ridiculous as some of the claims that driver manufacturers used to make where literally every year their driver was 10 yards longer than the previous year. 

1 hour ago, Cantankerish said:

ChetlovesMer brings up a good point here:

 

I'm not sure anyone's ever said that before.... Have you been drinking again?

CHEERS :beer:

Edited by ChetlovesMer

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
1 hour ago, Cantankerish said:

Then the positive options should simply garner more support.  Alternatively, how would you word the poll?

Your choices are skewed entirely toward distance.

  • "I gained more than 10 yards."
  • "I gained a bit of distance."
  • "My clubs were fine."
  • "Waste of money."
  • "Other"

Other will/should probably win, because a fitting is about much more than distance, yet you've positioned the poll as "I gained distance" versus "my clubs were fine" or "waste of money."

How about dispersion? Landing angle/height/launch angle improvements? Etc.

There's a lot more to fitting than distance.

  • Like 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm on the bubble here with fitting. I am happy with my distance on all my clubs, I don't physically need 10 more yards right now. Sure it would be great to have 280 yards of carry, but I'm ok for now. Im fighting a tendency to pull the ball, but even then its acceptable distance. Would club fitting fix that? I don't think so. My instructor can though, and did once before but now its crept back. I got all my measurements checked and I am a standard length and lie. When I buy new irons though I will get fitted if its free just to see. At some places it seems like the people were former car salesman. Now that I'm typing this, with all of the shaft companies out now and the advancements in even steel shafts, I'm starting to wonder if I need shafts with a stronger/lighter torque resistance. When does this ever stop!!!!😭

 

 :tmade: Stealth2 driver, 3 Fairway  :titleist: TSR 4 Hy. T-300 5-PW  :vokey: 52/56/60 SM9

:scotty_cameron: Newport Select 2 (2022 model) 

:snell: MTB Prime 3.0, :adidas: Tour360 22

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

I didn’t buy my new clubs because I hit them farther. I bought them because the dispersion was tighter, I launched them higher, they peak higher and land softer. I gained a few yards of distance from them but it’s probably not noticeable on the course.

We’ll see how they perform when I actually get out and play.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

51 minutes ago, billchao said:

I didn’t buy my new clubs because I hit them farther. I bought them because the dispersion was tighter, I launched them higher, they peak higher and land softer. I gained a few yards of distance from them but it’s probably not noticeable on the course.

We’ll see how they perform when I actually get out and play.

Well distance with your irons isn’t really a problem for you Mr. 8i 170yds....lol.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
22 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

Well distance with your irons isn’t really a problem for you Mr. 8i 170yds....lol.

Is that the one I hit at Celebration? Complete fluke. Swing hard in case you hit the ball, right? 😜

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A fitting to me should provide confidence in each club fit. Distance would be secondary. A driver I can control and bit fairways all day. Irons as someone mentioned gapping and ball flight. 
 

i would imagine distance would be gained by a few other aspects outside of a fitting. Exercise, proper instruction and practice. 

  :sunmountain: eco lite stand Bag
:tmade: Sim 2 Max driver
 :callaway: Mavrick 20 * hybrid
:tmade: M2 3HL                               :mizuno: JPX 923 5-gw                           

 Lazrus 52, 56 wedges

:scotty_cameron:
:true_linkswear:-Lux Hybrid, Lux Sport, Original 1.2

:clicgear:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


3 hours ago, iacas said:

Your choices are skewed entirely toward distance.

  • "I gained more than 10 yards."
  • "I gained a bit of distance."
  • "My clubs were fine."
  • "Waste of money."
  • "Other"

Other will/should probably win, because a fitting is about much more than distance, yet you've positioned the poll as "I gained distance" versus "my clubs were fine" or "waste of money."

How about dispersion? Landing angle/height/launch angle improvements? Etc.

There's a lot more to fitting than distance.

So, like I have been saying (and you have denied), you love to edit my posts.  I included two options for dispersion: "My dispersion is much tighter!" and "My dispersion is a bit better".  Why would you remove those?  I also did not include an "other" for ball fitting.  Yet, there it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
32 minutes ago, Cantankerish said:

So, like I have been saying (and you have denied), you love to edit my posts. I included two options for dispersion: "My dispersion is much tighter!" and "My dispersion is a bit better".  Why would you remove those?

I edited your poll to do two things:

  1. Remove the "multiple choice" option, which made absolutely no sense.
  2. Add an "other" option to the second question.

I did not do anything like what you said, and I advise you to stop making provably false allegations.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I didn't answer the poll questions because I felt the choices are a bit silly.

My fitting didn't gain me yards (the stronger lofts did that) or get me a tighter dispersion (working on my swing did that.) What it did do was determine what lie angle (standard) and club length (+1/4") were correct for me. I had already decided that I wanted to switch to graphite shafts because my old steel shafts were just feeling heavy, especially towards the end of a round. (Getting old, I guess.) I also wasn't sure if my clubhead speed had slowed down to the point where I needed to go back to regular shafts. (Not yet it hasn't.)

I don't necessarily think that a full blown Club Champion-type fitting is suitable for everyone. I've noticed that CC, in particular, appears to make more money on switching out the manufacturer's recommended selection of shafts with ridiculously expensive ones, increasing the final cost (and their profit) by a crazy amount as the price of the clubs themselves is controlled by the manufacturer. A friend of mine showed me a quote from Club Champion for set of irons where the upcharge on the shafts exceeded the cost of the clubs themselves. I told him if he bought clubs from them he was nuts.

A free fitting at a Golf Galaxy or PGA Superstore (assuming you buy your clubs there) with the tried and true lie board and face impact tape analysis, along with some Trackman analysis will serve the average golfer like me just fine. (That also assumes the fitter knows what he's doing.)  I've also noticed that Mizuno now has a new gizmo that puts some kind of sensor on a 7-iron and connects via bluetooth to an Ipad. After three swings it recommends several shafts with specs that you can then test. Pretty interesting way to do a fitting.

Driver, 3W & 4 Hybrid: 2023 :titleist: TSR3 
Irons: 2020 :titleist: T300
Wedges: 2012 :callaway: XTour 56o & 2021 Jaws 60o

Putter: :odyssey: Marxman (Mallet) / :tmade: Juno (Blade) plus 7 or 8 others in a barrel in my basement

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, billchao said:

Is that the one I hit at Celebration? Complete fluke. Swing hard in case you hit the ball, right? 😜

You’re modest. You made a swing and struck that ball as solid as possible. I don’t think if I did that I could hit an 8i 170+yds uphill. But...imagine if that was your stock swing....

1 hour ago, Cantankerish said:

So, like I have been saying (and you have denied), you love to edit my posts

No. He decides  to make it better phrased, more accurate and provide better insight than before as this his his website and he cares about that stuff..come on man....

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think with Club Champion, you probably can tell them "yeah, well now that we got the clubs picked out with the proper lie angles, what shafts don't require I sacrifice my first born?"

I'm sure they want to sell the clubs and they have shafts that are more mundane. Most club manufacturers might even have one that is close in properties that isn't an upcharge. You might have to speak up and ask.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I voted other because my iron fitting wasn't about added distance, in fact I weakened the lofts on most of the irons to improve my gapping. What the fitting did do was greatly improve my dispersion and ball flight, not to mention the intangible difference of giving me the confidence when I am standing over the ball that my equipment isn't making a negative impact, like my old, beaten up irons could have been.

Justin

Driver: :callaway: Rogue Draw 11* Evenflow Blue 65 X

Fairway Wood: :callaway: Epic Flash 5 Wood 18* Tensei Blue AV 75 X
Irons: :titleist: AP3 4-PW Project X 6.5   |   Wedges: :callaway: MD4 50*/56*/60*
Putter: :odyssey: O-Works Tank #1
                                                                       

My Swing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm with Xray... I might have gained distance, but more importantly I gained accuracy and ball flight, and more fun. My original clubs were off the shelf. For my new clubs, they were 1.25" longer, grip size down a size. Obviously finding the correct club head, where I hit closest to the sweet spot, and of course lie angle. Also testing and finding the best shaft too(ball flight).  I did not do a ball fitting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 1521 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I kind of figured that might be part of the problem. I’m still guilty of it myself at times and you’re a better ballstriker than I am. I imagine the temptation to go for the flag grows as you get more control over your wedges. Might want to think about shot selection, too. I don’t know how you typically play short game shots but I see a lot of people default to hitting high pitch shots from basically everywhere, to every hole location, without regard for how the green is contoured and how the ball might release depending on where it lands. I know my short game has been steadily improving from expanding my shot selection, overall. Though to be honest, part of that is from necessity because I was really struggling with pitch shots so I started hitting more chips from everywhere, but it taught me a lot more about how to play short game shots in general. NP man. We’re all learning and improving together. It is a really good tool.
    • 2 rounds this weekend, one at my home course and another course that I know well.   Played well for 3 of the 4 nines.    Ended up with an 80 and an 88.  Breaking it down by 9, it was 38, 42, 41, and a tough 47 where I somehow ended up with chipping/pitching shanks where I dropped at least 6 strokes on the last 6 holes.
    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...