Jump to content
IGNORED

General COVID-19 Topic


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, David in FL said:

For what it’s worth those of us who have opened up are showing Covid stats very similar to those places that remain locked down.  In some cases better.

This is the main point that should be debated and studied. Do restrictions work? If so, which ones? If not, we should eliminate them. Restrictions are costly to businesses, education, etc. They should be used only when absolutely necessary and proven to be effective. Perhaps there is strong science behind them, but the way the "open" and "closed" states are trending in tandem it's not real clear they work at all. 

8 minutes ago, CarlSpackler said:

I see that now. Not sure why I didn't see it before.

I edited to add the graph after I saw your question. More helpful to see both. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

14 minutes ago, iacas said:

Yes. Jesus.

Ok. Let me rephrase the question. Do they work well enough to justify their trade-offs? That's the question we should be able to debate openly. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

17 minutes ago, Braivo said:

Perhaps there is strong science behind them, but the way the "open" and "closed" states are trending in tandem it's not real clear they work at all. 

The USA is unfortunately a poor example because the timing and severity of the measures to prevent the pandemic varied so much from state to state, and even though there may have been restrictions on some interstate travel, it's not like it was enforced to a degree that mattered. Pandemic response, IMO, devolved into political theater (by all parties), and stopped being treated as a generational public health emergency. But it is pretty easy to see what measures are most effective by looking at the commonalities among countries that had really good outcomes, like Taiwan, New Zealand, Vietnam, etc. (kind of like commonalities of the swings of the best golfers).

  • Extensive testing
  • Extensive contact tracing
  • Immediate and mandatory quarantine for positive cases and contacts
  • Travel Restrictions
  • Universal mask adoption
  • Social distancing
  • Lockdown/shelter in place when needed

With regards to economic tradeoff, I would guess that countries that did best in stopping the pandemic with these measures, also had the best economic outcomes.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, Braivo said:

This is the main point that should be debated and studied. Do restrictions work? If so, which ones? If not, we should eliminate them. Restrictions are costly to businesses, education, etc. They should be used only when absolutely necessary and proven to be effective. Perhaps there is strong science behind them, but the way the "open" and "closed" states are trending in tandem it's not real clear they work at all. 

I edited to add the graph after I saw your question. More helpful to see both. 

Ah. So I am not crazy.

Well, at least not because of that.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, David in FL said:

If I’m not wearing a mask, I promise I won’t run up and hug you.

You probably wouldn't have hugged me before the coronavirus.  I'm quick, you wouldn't catch me.

2 hours ago, iacas said:

Yes. Jesus.

Hey, no politics or religion!  😁

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
7 hours ago, Braivo said:

Ok. Let me rephrase the question. Do they work well enough to justify their trade-offs? That's the question we should be able to debate openly. 

Yes, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

9 hours ago, Braivo said:

Do restrictions work? If so, which ones?

From 

apa_210305_covid_texas_restaurant_reopen

Investigators compare rates of new COVID-19 daily cases and deaths before and after state mask mandates and the lifting of in-person dining restrictions.
Quote

The numbers are in to back up two policies designed to restrict the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that when states lifted restrictions on dining on premises at restaurants, rates of daily COVID-19 cases jumped 41 to 100 days later. COVID-19-related deaths also increased significantly after 60 days.

On the other hand, the same report demonstrates that state mask mandates slowed the spread of SARS-CoV-2 within a few weeks.

The study was published online March 5 in the CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

9 hours ago, Braivo said:

Ok. Let me rephrase the question. Do they work well enough to justify their trade-offs? That's the question we should be able to debate openly. 

No, Jesus.  

But the difference probably lies between those who live in Pennsylvania which is deprived of freedom and those who live in Florida, which embraces it.  😊

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
6 minutes ago, David in FL said:

But the difference probably lies between those who live in Pennsylvania which is deprived of freedom and those who live in Florida, which embraces it.  😊

Nope.

  • Florida: 9.24% of the population has had COVID-19.
  • Pennsylvania: 7.58%.

And a good chunk of that was Philly right after New York spiked like crazy.

@David in FL, Florida's handling of COVID-19 has been a joke.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
41 minutes ago, iacas said:

Nope.

  • Florida: 9.24% of the population has had COVID-19.
  • Pennsylvania: 7.58%.

And a good chunk of that was Philly right after New York spiked like crazy.

@David in FL, Florida's handling of COVID-19 has been a joke.

And we are wide open and living life, as we have been for the past 8 months.  As a result, our economy is strong.
 

Pennsylvania’s handling of COVID-19 has been right up there with  California, New York, and Michigan.  Which may be why Florida has seen such an influx of people from your neck of the woods.  

Come on down. You can wear a mask if you like, or not.  We are easy to get along with.  😊

Edited by David in FL
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 hours ago, David in FL said:

And we are wide open and living life, as we have been for the past 8 months.  As a result, our economy is strong.
 

Pennsylvania’s handling of COVID-19 has been right up there with  California, New York, and Michigan.  Which may be why Florida has seen such an influx of people from your neck of the woods.  

Come on down. You can wear a mask if you like, or not.  We are easy to get along with.  😊

First of all, I'm not a doctor. 

Second of all, I've stated many times the quality of my education. 

Having said that, I remember early in the pandemic "they" said that you had to wear your mask to protect others. From what I understood you can spread the disease through your mouth and through your nose. So wearing a mask helps stop the spread. But you can catch the disease through your mouth, through your nose, AND through your eyes. So, wearing a mask only partially protects you from catching the disease. 

I don't know if that's true. (As stated, I'm no doctor.) But if it is, then I think its rather selfish to not wear a mask. My feeling is if I get the COVID I can get through it. But if I don't wear a mask I'm jeopardizing the health of all the high risk folks I encounter, and they may or may not be able to get through it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

I don't know if that's true. (As stated, I'm no doctor.) But if it is, then I think its rather selfish to not wear a mask. My feeling is if I get the COVID I can get through it. But if I don't wear a mask I'm jeopardizing the health of all the high risk folks I encounter, and they may or may not be able to get through it. 

I agree with this 100%.  I am not a Dr. either but my sister & sister in law are RNs and I have Doctors as clients and they tell me that if 1 of 2 people in close proximity wear a mask each have less risk of catching covid than if neither wears a mask.  If both wear a mask the risk goes down further for both.  Without knowing who is high risk I feel we owe it if each other to help reduce risk for all.  It is not about if I will survive it, it is about protecting those that will not.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, ChetlovesMer said:

So, wearing a mask only partially protects you from catching the disease. 

Well....we don’t eject fluids from our eyes like we do with our noses and mouths. Eyes can be a receiving port for particles but not a distributor. So, wearing masks are preventing one from casting matter that may contain the virus if infected. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

7 hours ago, iacas said:

Nope.

  • Florida: 9.24% of the population has had COVID-19.
  • Pennsylvania: 7.58%.

And a good chunk of that was Philly right after New York spiked like crazy.

@David in FL, Florida's handling of COVID-19 has been a joke.

What is the trade-off for being 1.68% better than another state? Completely collapsing your local economy for 1.68% difference? Is it worth it? 

Again, you have to look at both sides of the equation. Looking strictly at virus numbers and ignoring the other impacts is too narrowly focused. 

7 hours ago, David in FL said:

And we are wide open and living life, as we have been for the past 8 months.  As a result, our economy is strong.
 

Pennsylvania’s handling of COVID-19 has been right up there with  California, New York, and Michigan.  Which may be why Florida has seen such an influx of people from your neck of the woods.  

Come on down. You can wear a mask if you like, or not.  We are easy to get along with.  😊

Right. People can decide their own risk tolerance. If they want to stay home until a vaccine, their choice! 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, Braivo said:

What is the trade-off for being 1.68% better than another state? Completely collapsing your local economy for 1.68% difference? Is it worth it? 

Not sure I would claim that economy has collapsed in PA. This statement seems a bit over dramatic to me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, saevel25 said:

Not sure I would claim that economy has collapsed in PA. This statement seems a bit over dramatic to me. 

You always attack my word choices rather than the content of my statements. Telling. 

Is 1.68% worth the loss of economic activity over the last year? (Is that better?)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • I’ve done 54 on the same course a couple of times.   Always cart because they weren’t easily walkable.  I was able to keep my focus because my third round of the day was the best.     lot of weekends in my 20s, in walked and carried my bag for 36 each day.
    • I googled the reason for it and it also mentions that you also can’t change ball color as well for an advantage, but I’m having trouble coming up with something where the ball color changing during a round would be some type of advantage.   In other words, you can’t even use the exact same ball model with different colors in a round, anyone come up with changing ball color during the round somehow would help?
    • Because playing with a different ball may not be consecutive. Maybe someone plays a higher spin ball on par threes. Or a lower spin ball on par fives. 15 clubs is consecutive.
    • Thanks for that. But why a 2 strokes penalty per hole for unintentionally playing the wrong type of ball, until the mistake is discovered and rectified, while at the same time the penalty for unintentionally playing with too many clubs is capped at 2 strokes penalty for 2 holes maximum (only). What is different between those two, and how does that make any sense? I agree that one is a general rule applying to all golfers and the other is a local rule applying to high level competitions only. Is that it?
    • Slightly off-topic, kind of related to NLU on Torrey, but you can watch a course flyover, you can play it many times on a video game, you can watch it on tv, but it's just not the same as actually playing it. Being Captain Obvious here, I know.  
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bs1865
      bs1865
      (46 years old)
    2. DrMJG
      DrMJG
      (69 years old)
    3. Mikejanish
      Mikejanish
      (28 years old)
    4. Stu
      Stu
      (48 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...