• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Andrew123vl

Are you a feel or mechanical golfer?

81 posts in this topic

Hi everyone,

In the words of the great Lee Trevino, there are feel players and mechanical players, with most people falling somewhere inbetween. A 100 percent feel and 100 percent mechanical can achieve the same results.

Criteria -

Feel

Natural ability. The swing could be either ugly, strange or fairly orthodox looking, but works all the same. Would play a multitude of shots from 150 yards with various clubs. Doesn't benefit much from tuition. Doesn't need to practice much.

Mechanical

Learnt ability. The swing is learnt and probably looks fairly orthodox. Would have only one or two options from 150 yards. Benefits greatly from tuition. Devotes a lot of time to practice.

I would class myself as 70/30 feel/mechanical player - mostly natural but need to tweak technique a little, benefits from basic advice, would practice once a week for 2 hours and play 2 rounds of golf a week to continue to improve.

What are you?

Andrew.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Everyone is a feel player. Even when you learn the mechanics, you have to feel it. I think a better distinction is intuitive vs. calculating.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Grab stick, hit ball.

Thinking about mechanics only makes my head hurt and reminds me how little I actually understand about the golf swing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by geauxforbroke

Everyone is a feel player. Even when you learn the mechanics, you have to feel it. I think a better distinction is intuitive vs. calculating.

I've met plenty of players who have a set play for any shot or lie and never, ever improvise.  They usually play well in predictable situations, but are lost when a shot requires some imagination.  They have a Pelz style short game with everything calculated to death, but when the calculations fail, so do they.  To me, that's mechanical - robotic.

I am very much a feel player.  That hurts my long game as compared to the typical mechanical player, but I think that it makes me more competent in the short game and in recovery situations.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by geauxforbroke

Everyone is a feel player. Even when you learn the mechanics, you have to feel it. I think a better distinction is intuitive vs. calculating.

This.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Mechanics helps you make progress at the beginning, but eventually you must use feel to tell if your finer mechanics are correct.

Even with videotaping of golf swings, I need the right feel to be able to fine-tune the game. Problem is, the main feel I've noticed the last couple of years is my right hip getting tight, starting about the 15th hole. I do all the exercises, but still struggle at the end.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

When I'm playing well, I'm a feel player. I keep my head clear of minor swing thoughts and focus on my tempo, which usually results in a solid swing and better results.

When I get mechanical and start focusing on swing thoughts, it tends to work to the detriment of my game as a whole. I get so focused on solving my perceived problem, that I create a handful of new ones in it's place. I've learned that (for me, anyway), I need to correct my swing flaws on the range - trying to do it on the course is a fool's errand.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I fall in the "feel" category.  My son who is working really hard to get his game together was having problems chipping and pitching.  We were practicing one afternoon and he asked me about different shots I was hitting.  I had hit a couple from a hillside above the green that were like lob shots but from a lower spot I hit a pitch and run kind of shot but yet from down below the green I was hitting lob shots again.  He asked me why.  I remember I told him...."for me, it is all about how I "feel" the shot should look."  I have practiced all kinds of shots, trajectories, etc.  Honestly, I think that is why if I miss the green, I walk up to the ball with couple of club options in my hands.

I have some friends who have recently worked on their games very hard too but they are, in my mind, stuck on mechanics and they are struggling.  Their swings have become almost robotic, a bad robotic I must add.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm really trying hard to be a stupid golfer. Those are the guys that make the big bucks! ;-)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

For full swing, I'm totally mechanical. I would have loved to be the feel player - but my natural swing and the ball going down the fairway just weren't two things that came together.  I've learned a golf swing mechanically from beginning to end.

Short game and putting would be different for me.  I do a little of the Mickelson hinge and hold.  But other than that I just do what comes natural. Short game always seemed easier to me.  And my short game is way better than my full swing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to the golf swing I think I'm a mechanical golfer because I can't trust feel.  In general I'm a logic guy so I'm more comfortable with science and numbers than interpreting feel or what I'm supposed to feel.  I'll use the numbers to direct me towards what I should feel and work from there.   With regards to shots on the course I use both though admittedly I'm more ambitious with my "feel" shots than my mechanics can back up at this point.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

every player is mechanical and feel player. You have to have feel no matter what. IF you didn't feel anything you couldn't be mechanical to begin with because you would be able to feel the mechanics of the swing. So no matter what everyone is 100% a feel player. I they are not opposites of each other. Some swings are more mechanical then others. Like Matt Kutchar is very flat, and his swing is basically rotate back and through.

I would say, its mechanical versus non-mechanical. I can see the difference, Bubba Watson versus Matt Kutchar, but there all feel players.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Feel...To a fault.

As a stereotypical holistic action learner it works great for things I have never done before but the guys that follow the dots usually eventually catch and pass me...If they develop feel along the way.

To be as good as you can be almost always takes both (but good luck getting a holistic type to follow mechanical rules).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lee was wrong.

What he meant to say was that some players just guess, trying different things until they stumble onto the one that works that day/week/month/whatever, while others will hone in on what they need to fix (the mechanics) and them stumble around (but take far less time, typically) trying to find a feel that fixes the mechanics.


At the end of the day, everyone fixes the mechanics by employing some sort of "feel."

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Basic salesmanship..."Feel, Found, Felt"...   "I understand what you "feel", in fact, I have "found" that often times in the past, I have "felt" the same way. Now let help you understand  how.........

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I started as a "feel",imagining how a golf swing should feel. Then got frustrated,studied a bit and spent a LOT of time at the range in order to become "mechanical". Once I learned the principle mechanics of a golf swing I tried to become "feel" again. If I'm playing well and am hitting my second shot from a level place in the middle of the fairway, I'm feeling mechanical, if I have a lob wedge in my hand from within 25 yards of the green, I'm a 'feel' player. If I'm putting on a flat green from within 8 feet, I'm both or neither.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Feel.  I have no idea about swing path, angle of attack, other swing mechanic jargon.  When someone tells me that I'm too steep or flat all I know is what the ball did and where it ended up.  I can fix any abnormality in a couple of holes.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think everybody has some of both but if I were to choose I would say I am mechanical. I study and try to work on my mechanics as much as I can and I very rarely play a round without hitting a bucket prior. 150, no circumstances, I am hitting the same shot... my shot. The one I have worked on for countless hours and swings at the range and on course to be able to hit. When I run into a non traditional shot for the first time, like hitting under tree limbs while surrounded by trees, I may try to use feel to get lucky or pitch out but then you can bet I will be at home later learning that if I keep my right shoulder up my ball won't go in the air and I can punch it through the next time to advance toward the green and not waste a shot.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • No, not exactly...just a general or rough definition of "in the vicinity" will do. Not all of us are 1.5ers. 
    • Which range in the US, the piece doesn't say. Trackman Range is basically setting up multiple radars, 3 for example, so that it can provide numbers for a range of a given length, like 130 yards in the example here and everyone on that range in selected spots basically has radar. Here's the piece that talks about the setup some more plus putting. The new ability to measure putt related data is interesting as well, wonder what it'll add in addition to SAM Puttlab. 
    • Well,  you said for most people,  and I do not have a large sample size to draw from in my own experience in golf so... I draw from my own personal experience.    As a player there was a time when I wanted to change the shape of my swing very badly in a certain way.  I have found that when I tried to do that and hit a ball at the same time it was too much for my brain and I would find contact with the ball over making the change or the change I saw on video would be miniscule if present at all.  I found though that if I removed the ball I was able to make changes.  Now,  obviously this was making an air swing that might not even hit a ball on the ground.  No accuracy,  but that's the point!  Free the brain from having to put clubhead on ball for a minute and focus on something else to harness it a bit!  I removed all intention of a precise strike or clubface control by doing this.  I am talking now seriously make a swing or two look at video...most times exaggerate the move even more...look at video.  Repeat repeat repeat.   Same exact video angle all the time!   This is not a fast process I am just explaining what I was doing.  Backyard was perfect for this feel vs real experimentation feedback loop I was working on.  The only purpose of this was to develop a way I could learn to somewhat repeat what I was looking for.  Stage two would be targeting a tuft of grass and doing it again video.  Stage three would be maybe going out to the range and like you said rehearsing a few and then bringing in the ball and striking it. For me going out and shanking and slicing a bucket of balls working on a change costs money and it's hard to convince myself it's a success regardless of what I see on video.  I've done it several times. So,  before I did the whole air swing thing I hit many buckets and basically it was not effective at anything except maybe excercise and grooving compensations to the point I built myself a nice yip impact block on full swings.  Yes I admit at first I thought I could beat golf by athletic ability alone like every moron high cap that beats balls ingraining moves that need to be eliminated if they are ever to improve.  Without a couple simple workable concepts imo hitting balls is really the worst thing to do for a relatively inexperienced player.  So,  that's my take. For background info on me I played tennis in college and it was sport of focus from maybe sixth grade on and I took proper instruction with one coach for quite a while.  I feel I maximized my potential there.  Often in college I would surf in the morning early (skipping class obviously) and then for the afternoon travel for matches and play my singles and a doubles match.  My coach seriously used to ask me if I surfed that day because he said I played better when I did! I have a lot of experience in teaching athletics of various sorts  including surfing and soccer and I have been told many many times by many people that I have a natural affinity for teaching in a minimalistic simple fashion.  I succeeded in many ways in athletics but for me it was always a personal focus on technique that led to success.  Growing up I could never jump high or run very fast or lift heavy weights,  but I developed a pretty good jump shot in hoops.   I could kick a ball far and score goals in soccer. I am just not one of those naturally athletic fearless types who as a kid could jump their bike real huge or Ollie a skateboard a couple feet into the air or do a tuck flip off a diving board into a pool without thinking a bit how they did it.  I can identify those types and imo there's something happening there most of the rest of us ain't got!  Sure I could flip but it was an extended body flop of sorts lol.  In tennis I got decent,  but it was from good instruction,  good practice, an absolute ton of hours of hard work,  and if I might say so very good technique.  In golf I can't break par so I don't really ever bother people in swing threads unless I can speak from personal experience.  I realize I am not qualified to develop a swing to say a par shooter,  so I don't try to.   I think I might have some thoughts relative to some though.  Sorry for boring those who have read this but I must say I value my time spent on this site highly;  most sites are crud these days filled with Internet warrior liars who don't offer much true Quality.        
    • Yeah, I dunno about any of that. There were almost 150 women playing in this tournament (28*5, right?), no doubt many of them using the restroom during a round, yet only two used a cart to get there. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Golfgirl10543
      Golfgirl10543
      (43 years old)
    2. jkettman
      jkettman
      (28 years old)
    3. old man1953
      old man1953
      (64 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon