Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1764 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted
  On 12/7/2018 at 2:33 AM, iacas said:

Proximity, yeah, but putting could be a factor too if he's just not giving anything a chance to go in.

I'm a really good putter, and people playing with me will often remark how almost every putt looks like it had a chance. (I'll know pretty quickly whether one is just short, or pulled ever so slightly, etc.).

No, Scott knows a bit.

But I responded a few times to Breed, too:

 

Expand  

When DeChambeau won consecutive events this fall, Golf Channel did a short instructional video explaining that BD won because he was aiming more to the safe side of the flag on every GIR. He wasn't going 'at the pin' but going to the closest point to avoid a bigger problem. Sounds like 'Shot Zones' to me!

This was a refreshing video from them.

  • Like 2
  • Thumbs Up 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 5 weeks later...
  • Administrator
Posted

wedgeyardages.jpg

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Upvote 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I always aim at something. Sometimes the flag, other times a tree, bush or something. It just depends on where the trouble might be creating a risk reward situation. 

Aiming at something also gives me a line to use for obtaining my intermediate target which I use to aim my my club face with. 

What ever "thing" I aim at also represents my general landing area for the shot, since my ball flight might go left, right, or on line to my target. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
  On 1/7/2019 at 1:25 AM, Patch said:

I always aim at something. Sometimes the flag, other times a tree, bush or something. It just depends on where the trouble might be creating a risk reward situation. 

Aiming at something also gives me a line to use for obtaining my intermediate target which I use to aim my my club face with. 

What ever "thing" I aim at also represents my general landing area for the shot, since my ball flight might go left, right, or on line to my target. 

Expand  

You need to read more than the title of the topic before responding.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

This is just one of those concepts that once explained (and so clearly in this thread and LSW) seems like common sense but's has just been missed in my golf life. I've certainly never had an instructor discuss shot zones with me. It really makes one see the golf course in a different way imo.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
  On 1/7/2019 at 2:27 AM, Vinsk said:

This is just one of those concepts that once explained (and so clearly in this thread and LSW) seems like common sense but's has just been missed in my golf life. I've certainly never had an instructor discuss shot zones with me. It really makes one see the golf course in a different way imo.

Expand  

Even Dave and I changed the way we played the game after looking at the numbers, the data. And we'd already known them in general…

It's just about discipline. That's the toughest thing then, having the discipline to actually aim slightly away from the flag, to a different spot on the green or wherever.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I wonder if the popularity of laser range finders adds to this issue? Everyone and their cat gets distance to the flag on their Bushnell or whatever. Maybe we'd be better served to get a GPS device that only gives distance to the center of the green? 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  On 1/7/2019 at 2:34 AM, ChetlovesMer said:

I wonder if the popularity of laser range finders adds to this issue? Everyone and their cat gets distance to the flag on their Bushnell or whatever. Maybe we'd be better served to get a GPS device that only gives distance to the center of the green? 

Expand  

Maybe for some? IMO I don’t think knowing the distance to the flag adds any more confidence to a player. He’s making poor decisions (as I have for a long time) by just aiming for the flag. It’s not like he’s saying, ‘oh..the flag is 130 instead of 134? Well then I’m aiming right at it!’ He’s not making a decision to give him the best chance of scoring well based on his shot zones.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It’s funny because I still get questions from my buddies on this when they see my target is the opposite side of the green or at least much further from the flag than they are aiming. The one time they pull off the shot I still get the “see you don’t make birdies by playing safe”. Ah how soon they forget the triple double triple rally they just went on because they dumped it into the bunker from hell or multiple water hazards on approach shots. 

  On 1/7/2019 at 2:59 AM, Vinsk said:

Maybe for some? IMO I don’t think knowing the distance to the flag adds any more confidence to a player. He’s making poor decisions (as I have for a long time) by just aiming for the flag. It’s not like he’s saying, ‘oh..the flag is 130 instead of 134? Well then I’m aiming right at it!’ He’s not making a decision to give him the best chance of scoring well based on his shot zones.

Expand  

Yup ignore the flag and pay attention to the hazards. They don’t move. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
  On 1/7/2019 at 2:34 AM, ChetlovesMer said:

I wonder if the popularity of laser range finders adds to this issue? Everyone and their cat gets distance to the flag on their Bushnell or whatever. Maybe we'd be better served to get a GPS device that only gives distance to the center of the green? 

Expand  

It does take a while to understand that the flag distance may not be your shot distance once you understand shot zones. I try to get an idea of the distance to get on the green and to the hazards. The flag distance is only one number. Where to miss is just as important.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  On 1/7/2019 at 2:34 AM, ChetlovesMer said:

I wonder if the popularity of laser range finders adds to this issue? Everyone and their cat gets distance to the flag on their Bushnell or whatever. Maybe we'd be better served to get a GPS device that only gives distance to the center of the green? 

Expand  

I use my range finder to identify the yardages to clear greenside bunkers/make it on the green and how far the back of the green is as often, if not more often than I do to get the actual flag yardage

Driver: :titleist:  GT3
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  On 1/7/2019 at 2:34 AM, ChetlovesMer said:

I wonder if the popularity of laser range finders adds to this issue? Everyone and their cat gets distance to the flag on their Bushnell or whatever. Maybe we'd be better served to get a GPS device that only gives distance to the center of the green? 

Expand  

I don't think so. The flag is a target. We all have grown up playing some sort of target game before. It's more ingrained in our way of playing sports that predates the use of rangefinders.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  On 1/7/2019 at 2:34 AM, ChetlovesMer said:

I wonder if the popularity of laser range finders adds to this issue? Everyone and their cat gets distance to the flag on their Bushnell or whatever. Maybe we'd be better served to get a GPS device that only gives distance to the center of the green? 

Expand  

I personally think it does. There are a lot of times where you don't need to know the distance to the flag on a particular shot. On most of my approaches, if I had to choose, I would want to know the distance to the center of the green over the exact distance to the flag. It takes a lot of discipline, which most golfers don't have, to ignore the exact distance to the flag and play to the center of the green.

  • Like 1

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  On 1/7/2019 at 4:19 PM, DeadMan said:

I personally think it does. There are a lot of times where you don't need to know the distance to the flag on a particular shot. On most of my approaches, if I had to choose, I would want to know the distance to the center of the green over the exact distance to the flag. It takes a lot of discipline, which most golfers don't have, to ignore the exact distance to the flag and play to the center of the green.

Expand  

Pin is back, take the laser measurement and subtract 5 yards. Pin in the front, take the laser measurement and add 5 yards. There really isn't that many strange green complexes were you have to make crazy assumptions on how to get a safer landing area.

Aiming at the flag predates rangefinders. Also, I do not see rangefinders as the reason why people aim at the flag. Honestly, I can count on one hand the number of people in my golf league who own a rangefinder. They are not that common. Most people still judge distance from the yardage markers on the course and they still aim at the pin.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
  On 1/7/2019 at 6:03 PM, saevel25 said:

Aiming at the flag predates rangefinders. Also, I do not see rangefinders as the reason why people aim at the flag. Honestly, I can count on one hand the number of people in my golf league who own a rangefinder. They are not that common. Most people still judge distance from the yardage markers on the course and they still aim at the pin.

Expand  

Rangefinders aren't that common, you're right. A lot of people still play without 'em.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
  On 1/7/2019 at 6:03 PM, saevel25 said:

Pin is back, take the laser measurement and subtract 5 yards. Pin in the front, take the laser measurement and add 5 yards. There really isn't that many strange green complexes were you have to make crazy assumptions on how to get a safer landing area.

Aiming at the flag predates rangefinders. Also, I do not see rangefinders as the reason why people aim at the flag. Honestly, I can count on one hand the number of people in my golf league who own a rangefinder. They are not that common. Most people still judge distance from the yardage markers on the course and they still aim at the pin.

Expand  

I have to disagree.  I know a bunch of players who will get the number form their laser, and try to hit it exactly that distance.  It doesn't matter if their "number" is only 4 yards over a bunker, of 5 yards from the back edge, they're still playing the yardage to the flag, because that's the number their device gives them.  To do as you do (and I do too) is to take the "number" and use some judgement, and lots of players struggle with judgement.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  On 1/7/2019 at 6:03 PM, saevel25 said:

Pin is back, take the laser measurement and subtract 5 yards. Pin in the front, take the laser measurement and add 5 yards. There really isn't that many strange green complexes were you have to make crazy assumptions on how to get a safer landing area. 

Expand  

Right, in theory, it's fine. In practice, I'm not so sure. It takes a lot of discipline to throw out that exact number. You and I could definitely do it, but I'm not sure about others.

  On 1/7/2019 at 6:03 PM, saevel25 said:

Aiming at the flag predates rangefinders. Also, I do not see rangefinders as the reason why people aim at the flag. Honestly, I can count on one hand the number of people in my golf league who own a rangefinder. They are not that common. Most people still judge distance from the yardage markers on the course and they still aim at the pin.

Expand  

That's strange. In my men's club, everybody has some sort of GPS or rangefinder. Probably 75% have a rangefinder.

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
  On 1/7/2019 at 6:14 PM, DaveP043 said:

 I know a bunch of players who will get the number form their laser, and try to hit it exactly that distance.  It doesn't matter if their "number" is only 4 yards over a bunker, of 5 yards from the back edge, they're still playing the yardage to the flag, because that's the number their device gives them.  To do as you do (and I do too) is to take the "number" and use some judgement, and lots of players struggle with judgement.

Expand  

It doesn't require a LOT of judgment, just observation......

I play different courses as often as I can.  As such, I don't normally know the shape and layout of a green or even the pin placement assumption.  Left/right - I can see that normally of course and whether the flag is center or to one side or another.  But front to back I might be guessing a lot as to how deep to hit depending on how blind the view is.  The best I can do it scan the flag, scan the hazards and edges of the green and make a good guess of if the pin is short or long....  Then I adjust.  It only takes a few seconds, but it's nowhere near as easy as when I play a course I know directly. 

I mostly miss out on knowing how a green rolls and finding those obvious 'sweet spots' for more 'nuanced' greens.  That can fun to know that if I hit it 'here', it'll end up rolling all the way over to 'here'.  Don't get that often since I travel about.

Fortunately, (I might be fooling myself, but IMO) my distance control is a lot better than my lateral control (face drills please).  So if I play a safe zone left to right and the green isn't too twisted, I do ok.

I don't drive up and look, I don't like the time it takes even when when we are waiting.  It takes a pretty desparate needs to score good for me to pull that trick.

Edited by rehmwa

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1764 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Yes. The full swing is not that different, and speed is important with all of them. You don't see Tour players hitting their driver 310 and then hitting their 7I 160. Of course, but they're nothing like those for the full swing.
    • How about with the high numbered irons such as the 9 iron? Is the swing the same with that? If that's the case then I stand corrected.  OK, although there is physics involved in the putt too. 
    • I have a master's in Spanish linguistics and I like black holes.
    • I didn't say it was unfeasible. That's not what you said. And… be careful there. Not around the club's COM, man.
    • Our public course has red penalty areas marked with red stakes. The stakes are imprecisely placed, often overgrown or missing. Our golf club has no control over how the stakes are placed. We have therefore decided to create a local rule to define the penalty areas by physical features and ignore the red stakes.  Also, most of the currently marked penalty areas are because of an overgrown creek behind dense ground vegetation. The penalty areas are marked (roughly) at the edges of the dense vegetation (see picture example). Players cannot see the creek. The dense vegetation looks the same on holes where there is no creek and no penalty area. For consistency and to reduce confusion, we have decided to define all edges of dense ground vegetation as penalty area.   This adopts a popular USGA recommendation from 2019. Committee Procedures 2C(2) cautions: "A Committee may define the edge of a penalty area by clearly describing it in writing but should do so only if there will be little or no doubt where the edge is. For example, where there are large areas of lava or desert that are to be treated as penalty areas, and the border between these areas and the intended general area is well defined, the Committee could define the edge of the penalty area as being the edge of the lava bed or desert."  We are going ahead, but IMO "little or no doubt" is not possible. For example, the "edge of desert", no matter how "well defined" is often not a distinct line. Sand and grass may intermingle. An edge defined this way will never be as clear as stakes or a line. We will see what happens!  Other comments: I believe the change will improve pace of play. And have minimal effect on handicaps. (Seems like I saw a study of this, but unable to find it again.)    Does anyone have a similar experience with defining penalty areas by physical features? How did that go?     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...