Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2784 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Practice, practice, practice ..... I know....., but I see almost no use in practicing a shot I need once in maybe 5 rounds....... a flop shot might look be great, but often there lots of safer options and if you thin a flop shot (easely done) it may end anywhere.

I have been using lots of wedge sets, mine are now 44, 48, 52 and 58.

Cheers, Gerald.

Cal Razr Hawk 10.5 | TM Superfast 3W | Adams Idea Pro Black 20 | MP-68 3-PW | TW9 50/06 + 58/12 | Ram Zebra Putter


Posted
4 minutes ago, Gerald said:

Practice, practice, practice ..... I know....., but I see almost no use in practicing a shot I need once in maybe 5 rounds....... a flop shot might look be great, but often there lots of safer options and if you thin a flop shot (easely done) it may end anywhere.

I have been using lots of wedge sets, mine are now 44, 48, 52 and 58.

Cheers, Gerald.

Just because you use a 60 degree wedge doesnt mean the only shot you are allowed to hit with it is a flop shot...

I use my 60 for a wide variety of shots including pitches, chips from the rough, bunker shots, and pretty much anytime I'm 50-100 yards out. The only time I dont use my 60 inside of 100 yds is chipping from the fairway/fringe with no trouble in front, chipping with a lot of green to work with or when the rough around the green isnt very thick or the grass is bare. 

None of those shots are flop shots at all.

I could play all of those same shots I mentioned with a 58 degree wedge.  Its just not that different from a 60. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Driver: :titleist:  GT3
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I use a 58* but only out of a trap or if I have to go over a green side bunker, (which I hate). Other than that I use an 8 iron and bump and run it. I feel I have much more control. My success rate with a wedge is low, I hate sculling it across the green, drives me nuts!


Posted

For a while I played with my lowest lofted club as a 54˚.  Years ago I got a 60˚ and never looked back.  I've started to branch out a bit more, but I still use it for almost all shots inside 80 yards unless the wind is howling.  Honestly I never found it that hard to hit.  Any shot I could hit consistently with my 54˚, I could hit with my 60˚, but with more options for control of the ball.  The only miss that happens more often with the 60˚ is in a soft fluffy lie, every once in a while I'll slide the club most under the ball and come up way way short.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I use mine a lot, because I don't hit many greens in reg.  My 60 has zero bounce which I would not recommend...


Posted

I’m a HHC player. I use the 60 and it’s my go to club around the green. Once I learned how to pitch it became a great club for me. My handicap is on its way back down and using this club properly is one of the reasons. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 4/23/2018 at 11:57 AM, Gerald said:

I see that a lot of midcappers have a 60 degree lob wedge in the bag, but I see only very few able to do some magic with them.

For me personally a 58 is the lobbiest I can handle, but I have zero use for a 60 or 62 ..... or am I wrong ?

Well, I have my two cents on this.

I have got to sort out my game from 50-100 yards. If you go by my clubhead speed which is about 102 mph with a driver (though Monday I think I was swinging in the mid 90s my back was hurting from work). I was driving about 220 yesterday without the benefit of roll, I was only swinging at maybe 60% effort though. On my normal days when I am hitting it well, I drive it around 250 carry. I should be able to hit my 56° sand wedge about 100 yards... I'm scared to hit it more than 85. I can hit it fairly well with a half swing, but a full swing, forget it.

My lob wedge, I've hit it 3 times since I got it in February. 60° of useless club. I cannot hit the damn thing. To me 60° wedges should be avoided until one can confidently hit their 56 or 54 or 58 degree wedge in any situation. I honestly, am going to address it with my instructor next month.

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 4/23/2018 at 11:57 AM, Gerald said:

I see that a lot of midcappers have a 60 degree lob wedge in the bag, but I see only very few able to do some magic with them.

For me personally a 58 is the lobbiest I can handle, but I have zero use for a 60 or 62 ..... or am I wrong ?

My brother from another mother!   

Now let’s talk chippers!  :-) 

 

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 4/25/2018 at 1:31 AM, onthehunt526 said:

Well, I have my two cents on this.

I have got to sort out my game from 50-100 yards. ... .

My lob wedge, I've hit it 3 times since I got it in February. 60° of useless club. I cannot hit the damn thing. To me 60° wedges should be avoided until one can confidently hit their 56 or 54 or 58 degree wedge in any situation. I honestly, am going to address it with my instructor next month.

OTH, I'm confused... with your new Exotics CBX Blades, don't you get mainly GIR on your approaches? 😕

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 4/23/2018 at 9:56 AM, allenc said:

Very few mid handicappers can do something “magic” with any of their clubs.  But if they can take their lob wedge and do exactly the same move as they might do with their sand wedge, then the ball will go higher and shorter, which is what they want.

Also a 58 and a 60 are pretty close to the same thing.

Exactly what I was thinking. Sometimes I get "magic" from my 56 - and sometimes not. I bet the 60 would feel about the same.

I use old Taylor Made clubs from eBay and golf shops.


Posted
9 hours ago, WUTiger said:

OTH, I'm confused... with your new Exotics CBX Blades, don't you get mainly GIR on your approaches? 😕

Usually yes, I struggle in the 50-100 yard range, mostly third shots on par-fives, being out of position off the tee and just taking 4-wood or hybrid and advancing it... I'm also swinging a little slower because I've been on my feet a lot the last week or two, so my back is tightened up. So when I go play today... maybe I'll hit the practice area, and work on it for a while.

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I had always had a 56* as my most lofted club until this year. 3 years ago my 56* maxed out at 80 yards leaving me a dilemma at 90 yards:  Take a little off my gap wedge, which is my 100 yard club or step on my 56* and hope I didn't, hook, skull, chunk it. I also had trouble from like 60 yards to about 20 yards with my 56*. I felt real confident just off the green getting up and down about 50% of the time. This got worse last year when I purchased a new 56* that could barely fly 70 yards. I think it is because it had a lot more spin than my old one. So this year I have a new 54* and 58* and gave up a long iron. I was hoping that my 54* would be about 80 yards and my 58* about 60 yards. I am having a lot of trouble hitting these consistently especially the 58*. The turf interaction seems problematic for me. Sometimes the club goes over 60 yards and sometimes barely 50.

I also think that I am not hitting these lofted clubs as far as I would expect based on the distance my other clubs go. A 5i is my 175 yard club and my driver SS is about 100 MPH. So I would tend to agree with a statement about a 60* being for skilled players. I would also suggest that high handicappers carry fewer clubs and think less about which club to use and more about trying to make solid contact.  

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

A 60* wedge is very unforgiving if the proper action isn't used. Most struggle with them because they're steep and/or flipping. If the 60 digs and you don't make perfect contact, you're screwed. 

I use mine alot within 100 yards of the hole, but I also use my 54, it just depends on the lie, pin location, wind, etc. 

Being able to hit a 60 properly makes it alot easier to get at those front pins. 

 

 - Joel

TM M3 10.5 | TM M3 17 | Adams A12 3-4 hybrid | Mizuno JPX 919 Tour 5-PW

Vokey 50/54/60 | Odyssey Stroke Lab 7s | Bridgestone Tour B XS

Home Courses - Willow Run & Bakker Crossing

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 4/23/2018 at 10:57 AM, Gerald said:

I see that a lot of midcappers have a 60 degree lob wedge in the bag, but I see only very few able to do some magic with them.

For me personally a 58 is the lobbiest I can handle, but I have zero use for a 60 or 62 ..... or am I wrong ?

I personally think the bounce on your wedges plays an equally if not bigger factor in how you are going to use your wedges.  All else being the same, there should be little to no difference between your 58* and 60* wedge.  I use a 56* with a 14-deg bounce for conditions here in TX (apart from a 52* with a smaller bounce).  For increasing your options, it may be good to see what is the bounce on your other wedges have and what shots having that set-up helps you or prevents you from executing.  Hope that helps.

Driver: Taylormade M3 (9o) with Mitsubishi Tensei Blue 65 Stiff-flex shaft.  3-wood: Tour Edge Exotics CB2 (15o) with Fujikura Regular-flex

3H: Tour Edge (18o) with R-flex 80g shaft.  4H: 22o  Taylormade Rbz Stage 2 with R-flex shaft.

Irons (5-PW): Titleist 804os with True Temper reg. flex shaft.  Wedges: 50o deg Titleist SM-7 12o bounce F grind, 56o (bent to 54o) Cleveland RTG sand wedge, Cleveland RTX-3 CB 58o wedge 9o bounce.

Putter: TaylorMade Ghost Monte Carlo w/Super Stroke 2.0 grip

 


Posted

I use my LW all the time and consider it one of the best clubs in my bag (58 or 60 or whatever).

like all the clubs - if you can play it or not it is pretty much an individual call vs some generality on handicap.

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have had a 60* in my bag since the beginning some 40+ years of play.
I hit many poor shots and good shots in the early days while I was learning, but quickly learned 
when to use it properly. 

While it is not necessary my go-to club around the green, it certainly opens options when needed.

Johnny Rocket - Let's Rock and Roll and play some golf !!!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't see why 60+ would be an issue.  I carry a 60 and 64.  On full shots they really help dial in that part of the bag.  I carry my 64 75y and my 60 88y.  Around the greens I use mostly the 60, but I'll use a 64 if I've short sided myself or need to get the ball up really, really quickly.  It just takes practice and really...commitment to the shot.  If you're not committed, you'll get bad results.  For me it's all about keeping the loft on the face with my right hand going back and coming through.  I don't really accelerate through (feeling wise)- I more or less just keep the same speed back and through- sort of like making a simple tossing motion.  Open up the face and use the bounce.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

A little true story about a 72* wedge. I may heve told this already, but it is fun story. 

I was with my nephew at some course north of Ft Worth. "Willow" something was the name of the course. 

The day before we were at Sports Academy (?), and there was this 72*  wedge being sold for $30. We laughed about it, but I went a head and bought it. 

Now I could hit my 60* wedge consistently well at the time. However, this 72* was something not of this world. I couldn't hit it to save my soul. I actually didn't think I could hit it, so it was more fun than frustrating

At the range, a guy was in  the station next to me, with a caddy no less. There was tournament going on. He saw me fooling around with the wedge, and asked about it. Showed it to him, and asked if could hit a few with it. Both he, and his caddy tried it. Neither one had much luck with it. The golfer kept hitting it trying to figure it out. 

After we were finished with our own range session, we went to the 19th for s soda. The golfer's caddy saw us, and came over.  When asked why he was not with his pro, he told us that 72* wedge screwed him up so bad, that he withdrew during the second hole. He couldn't hit anything in their bag. That he was indeed a scratch golfer, and they were there qualifying for something. 

I left that wedge in Texas.

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2784 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.