Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1132 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, iacas said:
GettyImages-1308356544.jpg

With COVID-19 restrictions lifted, the city is seeing huge crowds and mass arrests.

Hmmmmmm.

I am just hoping those spring breakers do not bring it back home with them and start new spikes, and hopefully do not kill someone’s loved one.

Stuart M.
 

I am a "SCRATCH GOLFER".  I hit ball, Ball hits Tree, I scratch my head. 😜

Driver: Ping G410 Plus 10.5* +1* / 3 Hybrid: Cleveland HIBORE XLS / 4,5 & 6 Hybrids: Mizuno JP FLI-HI / Irons/Wedges 7-8-9-P-G: Mizuno JPX800 HD / Sand Wedge: Mizuno JPX 800 / Lob Wedge: Cleveland CBX 60* / Putter: Odyssey White Hot OG 7S / Balls: Srixon Soft / Beer: Labatt Blue (or anything nice & cold) 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 3.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
22 minutes ago, StuM said:

I am just hoping those spring breakers do not bring it back home with them and start new spikes, and hopefully do not kill someone’s loved one.

... again. 

00virus-springbreak-promo-videoSixteenBy

People got sick — and some died — after attending crowded parties and theme parks in Florida as the coronavirus spread.

 

Craig
What's in the :ogio: Silencer bag (on the :clicgear: cart)
Driver: :callaway: Razr Fit 10.5°  
5 Wood: :tmade: Burner  
Hybrid: :cobra: Baffler DWS 20°
Irons: :ping: G400 
Wedge: :ping: Glide 2.0 54° ES grind 
Putter: :heavyputter:  midweight CX2
:aimpoint:,  :bushnell: Tour V4

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
55 minutes ago, Missouri Swede said:

... again. 

00virus-springbreak-promo-videoSixteenBy

People got sick — and some died — after attending crowded parties and theme parks in Florida as the coronavirus spread.

 

History does not repeat itself, but it often rhymes.  Attributed to Mark Twain.

Stuart M.
 

I am a "SCRATCH GOLFER".  I hit ball, Ball hits Tree, I scratch my head. 😜

Driver: Ping G410 Plus 10.5* +1* / 3 Hybrid: Cleveland HIBORE XLS / 4,5 & 6 Hybrids: Mizuno JP FLI-HI / Irons/Wedges 7-8-9-P-G: Mizuno JPX800 HD / Sand Wedge: Mizuno JPX 800 / Lob Wedge: Cleveland CBX 60* / Putter: Odyssey White Hot OG 7S / Balls: Srixon Soft / Beer: Labatt Blue (or anything nice & cold) 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Interesting-We have not heard from @David in FL  the last few days.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, Phil McGleno said:

Interesting-We have not heard from @David in FL  the last few days.

I don't think David is the type to party and revel with the Spring Break kids in Miami.  But who knows?  I will check the obits.


Posted
11 hours ago, Double Mocha Man said:

I don't think David is the type to party and revel with the Spring Break kids in Miami.  But who knows?  I will check the obits.

Playing golf and shooting pool.  Pool tournament this past weekend in my local room.  Played ok, but pretty much out of my league.  Finished T22 out of 64 which was actually good for me.  
 

Not a big deal with respect to the closures in Miami.  Ft Lauderdale is only 25 miles away and happy to have a few more.  Bike week was last week in Daytona and was a “roaring” success by all reports.

My only complaint is that it’s gonna be in the 90’s this week and our member/member starts Friday.  That’s way too damn hot this early in the year!  😑

 

 

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

"OMG all those Super Bowl celebrations will spread COVID!" 

https://www.tampabay.com/news/health/2021/03/03/tampas-super-bowl-was-not-a-coronavirus-super-spreader-officials-say/

Now it's "Look at all those people having fun, STOP THEM!" 

Spring breakers are a low risk group, they'll be fine. 

Also, open the schools!

COVID-19-SM-1200px-v2.jpg

CDC provides credible COVID-19 health information to the U.S.

 

Quote

Based on the data available, in-person learning in schools has not been associated with substantial community transmission. Although national COVID-19 case incidence rates among children and adolescents have risen over time, this trend parallels trends observed among adults.17 Increases in case incidence among school-aged children and school reopenings do not appear to pre-date increases in community transmission.17,32-34

 

- Mark

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
29 minutes ago, David in FL said:

My only complaint is that it’s gonna be in the 90’s this week and our member/member starts Friday.  That’s way too damn hot this early in the year!  😑

It was perfect when I was down there a few weeks ago. It actually could have been a bit warmer for my tastes.

As for COVID, it will be made available to our employees and families in early April. I guess I am still not sold...

 

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, Braivo said:

Spring breakers are a low risk group, they'll be fine.

This is like saying Mary Mallon was low risk for Typhoid. They’re low risk for serious complications, not low risk for contracting the disease. They can still be carriers.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

 

1 hour ago, Braivo said:

Spring breakers are a low risk group, they'll be fine. 

Also, open the schools!

Spring breakers may (mostly) be fine, but they certainly can transmit the virus to waitresses and bartenders who're taking care of them in Florida, and they certainly can bring the virus home to their loved ones, friends, university instructors, and others they may need to be around.  Of course they're just college students, they don't always think about the long-term effects of their selfishness or foolishness.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Batman Facepalm GIF by WE tv

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

 

Spring breakers may (mostly) be fine, but they certainly can transmit the virus to waitresses and bartenders who're taking care of them in Florida, and they certainly can bring the virus home to their loved ones, friends, university instructors, and others they may need to be around.  Of course they're just college students, they don't always think about the long-term effects of their selfishness or foolishness.

Several universities and colleges cancelled both fall and spring breaks because of this. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The only graph that matters in my opinion - hospitalizations. The only reason we closed things down was to avoid overwhelming the hospital system. We flattened the curve into submission and are nowhere near threatening capacity. With the vulnerable population largely vaccinated, we are unlikely to get anywhere close again. Forcing closures should be a last resort to avoid overwhelming our medial system. That is not the case, so no such measures should be in place. 

hospital-admissions.jpg

- Mark

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, CarlSpackler said:

It was perfect when I was down there a few weeks ago. It actually could have been a bit warmer for my tastes.

As for COVID, it will be made available to our employees and families in early April. I guess I am still not sold...

 

Courses are in really good shape right now though!

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
23 minutes ago, Braivo said:

With the vulnerable population largely vaccinated, we are unlikely to get anywhere close again.

I'd suggest you're jumping the gun a bit, as you've consistently chosen to do.  13% of the total population is fully vaccinated, 42% of those over 65.  Those numbers are headed in the right direction, and faster all the time, so in a few more weeks I'd be inclined to agree with you, but not yet.  Unlike the spring breakers, who I expect to act like idiots, I hope our public officials act like adults.  

One thing I've noted with the graphs and trends over the past year, a trend usually continues for a few weeks after any action is taken that might change it.  We could open absolutely everything right now, and still see cases and deaths and hospital occupancy continue to decline for a couple of weeks.  The graph you presented indicates that the decline in admissions is slowing.  That in itself could be an indication that admissions are likely to level out and then increase in the next few weeks.  This could be just the same as happened in August and September in the same chart, the decline slowing, levelling out, and eventually admissions rising steeply.  Continued caution is appropriate.  Not complete closures and lockdown, but caution.  

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
18 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

I'd suggest you're jumping the gun a bit, as you've consistently chosen to do.  13% of the total population is fully vaccinated, 42% of those over 65.  Those numbers are headed in the right direction, and faster all the time, so in a few more weeks I'd be inclined to agree with you, but not yet.  Unlike the spring breakers, who I expect to act like idiots, I hope our public officials act like adults.  

One thing I've noted with the graphs and trends over the past year, a trend usually continues for a few weeks after any action is taken that might change it.  We could open absolutely everything right now, and still see cases and deaths and hospital occupancy continue to decline for a couple of weeks.  The graph you presented indicates that the decline in admissions is slowing.  That in itself could be an indication that admissions are likely to level out and then increase in the next few weeks.  This could be just the same as happened in August and September in the same chart, the decline slowing, levelling out, and eventually admissions rising steeply.  Continued caution is appropriate.  Not complete closures and lockdown, but caution.  

Along with what @DaveP043says the other thing to keep in mind are the chances for mutations (or "variants" as they like to call them). The more open things are now - like the spring breakers - the better the chance that we'll end up with a mutation that might render our current vaccines less useful. The sooner we stop the spread the better our chances of containing this thing and preventing that from occurring.


  • Administrator
Posted
53 minutes ago, Braivo said:

The only graph that matters in my opinion - hospitalizations. The only reason we closed things down was to avoid overwhelming the hospital system. We flattened the curve into submission and are nowhere near threatening capacity. With the vulnerable population largely vaccinated, we are unlikely to get anywhere close again. Forcing closures should be a last resort to avoid overwhelming our medial system. That is not the case, so no such measures should be in place. 

hospital-admissions.jpg

@Braivo, in addition to what @DaveP043 says about your bullshit understanding of the facts (of course he isn't as direct about it), and then @Zippo about the spreading of variants that have unknown potential… the "hospitalizations" graph isn't all there is to it.

There are deaths to consider. There are the long-term effects of COVID-19, which we don't know, to consider. There are several other things you're seemingly willfully ignoring to paint as rosy of a false picture here as you can.

I didn't fear getting COVID-19 myself very much, but had I gotten it, I wouldn't have been able to work for 2+ weeks and would be out a few thousand dollars. I wouldn't want to consider that I could have passed it on to some kid, who passed it on to their grandmother, who then got sick or died.

Also, vaccines are only 95% effective at stopping severe infections/death, they're not a shield that stops someone from getting COVID-19.

Science, man. Stop being this guy:

No Way Reaction GIF by Andrew Deitsch Podcast

You're totally Leon Letting this thing.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1132 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 41, June 14.  I spent 10 minutes, half hitting W half hitting 6-iron, practice shots (indoors, off a mat, into a net)
    • Day 620 - 2026-06-14 Got some work in before and after lessons. Definitely didn't adduct my arms 130° in doing so.
    • Day 79: played 18. Shot a +5 76. Iron play was much better - 11 GIR. Hit a drive 380. Normal day. 
    • Day 14 (14 Jun 26) - Continued work with irons (8i-Pw), hard foam balls and getting consistent impact - same as previous drills - using gates for 1/2 and “simulated” course conditions on the second half.  
    • I like discussing the golf swing. Whether you call it "swing theory" or what, I like to talk about things that can expand the potential for what I know and understand. As a scientist, I like being shown that I'm wrong, too, because as I've said a bunch of times… "you're wrong and here's why" is an instant opportunity to upgrade my knowledge. I also like to help golfers, and one of the things I'm most glad to have moved away from from 15 years ago was the "Hands In" idea from S&T. Jim Waldron is often credited (probably rightly so) with explaining why so many Tour players and good players talk about "keeping their hands in front of themselves" while it appears that they're moving their arms around their bodies. From over 30 years ago: I've also got videos like… this (Instagram link here😞 I'm happy to say that I've become friends with Shaun and Mike at Athletic Motion Golf (AMG), too. I tend to get along with other smart folks who measure things, who look critically at information, who don't assume that what they thought 20 years ago holds true today. I get along with folks who look for chances to instantly upgrade their knowledge. Andy Plummer remains one of the people who does not look for these opportunities. He didn't care in early 2013 when we had evidence that the information in their S&T 2.0 DVDs was bogus, and they seemingly don't care now. They've been attacking (it's their favorite pastime) AMG in particular for the better part of a year now. There have been a few shots back at them from AMG (like… this), no doubt. But as is typical of the AMG fellas, it's with measured data. Well, recently, Andy took yet another shot at AMG: https://www.instagram.com/p/DZfHe0DuPXC/. Andy demonstrates that true power in the golf swing comes from doing stuff like this: Andy claims that the idea that the arms mostly lift and lower, while the body turns, is bogus. What golfers should be doing is using "angular velocity" to abduct and adduct their shoulders to move the club fast like this (above). Then he makes a ridiculous example of what AMG supposedly teaches, but misses by a mile. Now, it doesn't take a biomechanist to know that you can't possibly swing as Andy demonstrates. His right arm is so far around and behind him that his left arm would have to grow several feet to reach the grip of the club (or alignment stick), and a follow-through with the right arm position like that would be absolutely silly. But, it's a demonstration, so let's not read too much into it. However, I find ideas like this dangerous. Again, I like to help golfers, and in my opinion, the idea that you should abduct and adduct your arms a lot is a dangerous one. There's some adduction and abduction going on, but… it's not much. Anyway, this statement was posted: 130 degrees of dynamic range of horizontal abduction and adduction is quite the claim! I posted some comments to Andy and others, and was issued a challenge: Well, okay then. Here's Bryson's lead shoulder adduction: This measures the angle between the "virtual spine," the left shoulder, and the elbow. Bryson has a 97.34° "adduction angle" at P1, a 62.53° angle at P4, and returns to an 89.21° angle at impact. Rounding, that's a change of 34° from address to the top, and then a change (back toward the angle at address) of about 26° from the top to impact. If we want to worry about only horizontal abduction and adduction (where D = adduction and B = abduction): Left shoulder: 8.33° D, 38.74° D, 14.67° D Right shoulder: 1.03° D, 55.75° B, 14.04° B If we call moving the arms farther around you as negative, those are changes of -30.41° from P1 to P4 for the left shoulder and +24.07° from P4 to P7 for the left shoulder and -56.78° and +41.71° for the right shoulder. I have no idea on earth where he gets 130°. From the last frame of Bryson's swing where he's at 126.98°? But the lowest that number gets is 62.53°, for a range of 64.45, or less than half of the 130° claimed (plus it includes part of the swing, post-impact, that has no bearing on what the ball does). For good measure, another pretty good player: Left: 22.55° D ➡️ 33.35° D (∆ 10.8°) ➡️ 17.36° D (∆ 15.99° from P4, 5.19° from P1) Right: 15.03° D ➡️ 24.29° B (∆ 39.32°) ➡️ 1.93° D (∆ 26.22° from P4, 13.1° from P1) Of the biomechanists and experienced 3D users (on any platform), none of them have seen anything like 130° of dynamic adduction/abduction from a good player P1 to P7. And, like my little joke above, even if you go to the end of the swing, you rarely get much more than a little over halfway there. Maybe Andy is adding them? He does say in the video "and then add it to that with the lead arm." (I think that's what he says, but this isn't an additive type system.) I regularly coach golfers out of positions with a lot of adduction and abduction. I regularly work golfers away from moving their arms around their bodies. Even my juniors (the ones who have paid attention anyway! 🤣) can recite "arms = up/down, body = around." Like this: So, I don't know where this leaves us. Andy claims to have seen something on GEARS that shows 130° of dynamic adduction/abduction. I'm open to being wrong, but… I don't think I am here on this one. And, until that comes to be, I will continue to stand up for what I think is the best information, and do my best to work with golfers toward simpler, easier moves that don't get them stuck. Simpler, easier moves like the moves Tour players and great players tend to make, not complicated, difficult moves. Shaun and Mike said it in a video once where they demonstrated that the average Tour player adducts their lead arm 20° across their chest from the top to impact (P4 to P7), while the amateur often tries to go 40°. They said something like "the amateur is trying to move their arm TWICE the distance in the same amount of time as the professional athlete." Yep. The swings of great players are often easier and simpler. They are not abducting and adducting their arms much in comparison to average golfers. As a smart man once said: "Why would you teach something (abduction in this case) that bad golfers already do?" On a related note… the S&T crowd continues to be… well, who they've been as long as I've known them. Take this comment for example: I mean… I would think that this is pretty self-explanatory, but then again… I didn't think it needed explaining to begin with. P.S. As I was finishing up this article, another biomechanist replied with something so simple I hadn't even thought of it as I had immediately jumped into looking at the actual measurements: "90 doesn’t even seem physically possible.“ No, sir. It doesn't.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.