Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Reasonable Driver Club Speed Formula to Aim for?


Note: This thread is 986 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Mine ended up around 117 mph, which works out to be pretty accurate. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm going to use this formula as a reason not to go on a diet and lose the weight I probably should... As long as I stay fat I should be able to swing the club faster.

  • Funny 5

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The biggest problem with this formula is weight and age.  My answer works out to 112 because I am short and heavy and the amount I am discounting for my age is too low.  This possibly works for athletic people.  Maybe time for me to go on a diet and hit the gym to get up to my predicted speed.  Even when I was younger I never got much above 105 probably or at a push 110 when everything went right and I was a lot fitter.  High 90's to low 100's was more realistic and now I am probably low to mid90's I reckon.  Must admit haven't been on a simulator in a long time so no idea what I am actually swinging

What's in the bag

  • Taylor Made r5 dual Draw 9.5* (stiff)
  • Cobra Baffler 4H (stiff)
  • Taylor Made RAC OS 6-9,P,S (regular)
  • Golden Bear LD5.0 60* (regular)
  • Aidia Z-009 Putter
  • Inesis Tour 900 golf ball
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I get 122.7 when I plug the numbers into the formula. Didn’t feel like adding my 1/2 to 6’6”.

I don’t swing nearly that. My body won’t let me. I can maybe sneak 103 or so, but honestly I hit it 250-260 yards.

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I got 109, which I’ve hit with speed training but it’s about 10-15 more than I record with normal driver swings. I would suggest @p1n9183 create a spreadsheet we could all input information and see if we could come up with better factors. The more data we gather, the more accurate the factors could be.

  • Like 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
35 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

I got 109, which I’ve hit with speed training but it’s about 10-15 more than I record with normal driver swings. I would suggest @p1n9183 create a spreadsheet we could all input information and see if we could come up with better factors. The more data we gather, the more accurate the factors could be.

A base constant of 99.6 mph is too high to begin with. My avg CHS is 93-94 mph. So unless remaining calculation comes up with a negative value it can't come even close for me. 

BTW, @p1n9183, cool exercise man.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 minutes ago, GolfLug said:

A base constant of 99.6 mph is too high to begin with. My avg CHS is 93-94 mph. So unless remaining calculation comes up with a negative value it can't come even close for me. 

I think the OP mentioned at the beginning that he was searching for a math formula to calculate your potential speed, not your actual speed. 
So, this formula would help you set a goal speed to strive for. 

So logically the formula for potential should give a higher number than your current average. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
14 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

I think the OP mentioned at the beginning that he was searching for a math formula to calculate your potential speed, not your actual speed. 
So, this formula would help you set a goal speed to strive for. 

So logically the formula for potential should give a higher number than your current average. 

This is why I think we all should provide data to help create the model. We all have different body types and ages.

  • Like 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
28 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

This is why I think we all should provide data to help create the model. We all have different body types and ages.

But… it’s your current speed, not your potential.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
50 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

I think the OP mentioned at the beginning that he was searching for a math formula to calculate your potential speed, not your actual speed. 
So, this formula would help you set a goal speed to strive for. 

So logically the formula for potential should give a higher number than your current average. 

Fair point. Fair point.

I guess I have horribly inefficient mechanics or have molasses running through my veins.. or.... both. Either way I'm leaving a lot on the table. I've always wondered why am I already not on 'Tour'. This splains it hehe.

  • Funny 2

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, boogielicious said:

This is why I think we all should provide data to help create the model. We all have different body types and ages.

The problem is, as I mentioned, earlier: Without that data including body fat percentage the weight metric is pretty useless.  But, without the weight metric, it's also not going to be particularly meaningful.

E.g.: Re-doing my numbers with my old weight, before I started controlling my diet and working out again:

99.6 + 76*0.13 + 195*0.08 - 72*0.24 = 108

That formula shows a 1 MPH faster potential CHS because I weighed ten pounds more.  But, that was when I was at 23% body fat.  Lean body mass then: 150 lbs.  Lean body mass now: 155 lbs.  So I have five pounds more muscle than I had then, but, I'd have less CHS?

The importance of body fat in the calculation becomes even more apparent if you consider the fact that, when I was at peak fitness I weighed about 195 lbs. and had 15% body fat.  165 lbs. of lean body mass: 15 lbs. more than I have now.

I also know that, back in 2020, when I was still pretty fit, I was averaging 135-140 yards with my 7i--wonky swing and all.  By last year, with a better, more consistent swing, I'd lost about 20 yards.  Difference?  I'm guessing most likely because I hadn't worked-out for two years.

What the additional data might help with is deriving a sub-expression to more-accurately account for age.  But, my guess would be that data already exists.  (I'd be surprised if TrackMan didn't have it.  They seem to have stats on everything else.)

 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Posted
23 minutes ago, SEMI_Duffer said:

The problem is, as I mentioned, earlier: Without that data including body fat percentage the weight metric is pretty useless.  But, without the weight metric, it's also not going to be particularly meaningful.

E.g.: Re-doing my numbers with my old weight, before I started controlling my diet and working out again:

99.6 + 76*0.13 + 195*0.08 - 72*0.24 = 108

That formula shows a 1 MPH faster potential CHS because I weighed ten pounds more.  But, that was when I was at 23% body fat.  Lean body mass then: 150 lbs.  Lean body mass now: 155 lbs.  So I have five pounds more muscle than I had then, but, I'd have less CHS?

The importance of body fat in the calculation becomes even more apparent if you consider the fact that, when I was at peak fitness I weighed about 195 lbs. and had 15% body fat.  165 lbs. of lean body mass: 15 lbs. more than I have now.

I also know that, back in 2020, when I was still pretty fit, I was averaging 135-140 yards with my 7i--wonky swing and all.  By last year, with a better, more consistent swing, I'd lost about 20 yards.  Difference?  I'm guessing most likely because I hadn't worked-out for two years.

What the additional data might help with is deriving a sub-expression to more-accurately account for age.  But, my guess would be that data already exists.  (I'd be surprised if TrackMan didn't have it.  They seem to have stats on everything else.)

 

I think some dynamic abilities like vertical leap height and how far out can one skip a rock have to be factors. A static factor like weight can be very misleading for obvious reasons. Maybe adding a BMI qualifier might make it a cleaner factor.   

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, GolfLug said:

Maybe adding a BMI qualifier might make it a cleaner factor.   

Nope.  E.g.: My BMI was higher when I was at 195 lbs. and 15% BF than it is now, but, I had much more muscle mass.

You might be able to SWAG it with some kind of height vs. waist size calculation, though.

Edited by SEMI_Duffer

Posted

BMI is not a good proxy for athletes since the muscle mass can give them a high BMI. Body fat % is probably a better indicator. Ideally you want lean body mass. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The math is close for me.

73" tall, 220lbs, 60 years old

Theoretical max SS of 112.3mph. 

My regular driver SS is 103-105. I can crank it up to 109-110mph but directional control gets worse (which is why I don't swing that hard).

I hit 70% of fairways when swinging at 103-105. Not a fan of bomb and gouge. I really prefer hitting my 2nd shot from the fairway and not from behind a tree, even if it is 20 yards further back, 


Posted
9 hours ago, tourproto said:

I hit 70% of fairways when swinging at 103-105. Not a fan of bomb and gouge.

"Bomb and Gouge" results in lower scores over the long term though. Driving distance is a much bigger separator between various levels of handicap than fairways hit.

 

9 hours ago, tourproto said:

I really prefer hitting my 2nd shot from the fairway and not from behind a tree, even if it is 20 yards further back, 

But you wouldn't hit every single tee shot behind a tree if you hit it 20yds further though... What about the times where you'd hit the fairway with the faster swing and be 20yds further ahead?

This is a conversation for a different topic but I strongly encourage you to be more open minded and learn about what the facts and data say around distance vs accuracy and the benefits that speed can provide.

  • Thumbs Up 3

Driver: :titleist:  GT3
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, klineka said:

"Bomb and Gouge" results in lower scores over the long term though. Driving distance is a much bigger separator between various levels of handicap than fairways hit.

 

But you wouldn't hit every single tee shot behind a tree if you hit it 20yds further though... What about the times where you'd hit the fairway with the faster swing and be 20yds further ahead?

This is a conversation for a different topic but I strongly encourage you to be more open minded and learn about what the facts and data say around distance vs accuracy and the benefits that speed can provide.

Not saying @tourproto is one, but you’ll most likely get no mileage outta this. Even though it’s widely known and proven that what you said is 100% factual, when you mention math/statistics….you lose people. They think their ‘personal experience’ always places them as an outlier.

  • Like 1

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
2 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

They think their ‘personal experience’ always places them as an outlier.

My personal experience makes me an outlier. So does the data, unfortunately 😃

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Funny 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 986 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Still working on the backswing a bit. Hand still gets away from the body, out towards the ball, and at A2 the club wants to roll over and get flat at A3. It's just very difficult to shallow from that position like I want. Which makes my downswing work impossible.  Backswing I have been playing around with the left leg straightening to start the backswing. It's like, a slight shove of the hips right with the left leg. Then just keep the flex in the right knee as I turn into it. I kind of like it. I never had a good swing trigger. It helps keep my left knee extended.  Yea, definitely feeling the hand path is traveling down the feet line, and straight up. A little bit of wrist rotation, and a lot more hinge sooner in the right wrist and elbow. I am trying to get the feeling that the arm hinging up then is the cause for the right shoulder to retract to finish the backswing. Club feels much more vertical at A3. I am trying to have my wrist fully hinged by then.  Feel the club and arms stop at A3.5 (my A4). If my arm collapses late, then I turn into that and I am pretty much screwed. The club and arms kind of have a floaty feeling, where they are just suspended in air for a bit, then drop.  Downswing I have been trying to think of a good visual for this mentally. I like the idea of my hands taking a wide arc to my right pocket, or I am taking the back of the hosel and trying to hit the ground behind my right foot.    Left knee stuff, just sooner. 
    • Day 78 - 2026-03-10 Backswing work at the net with foam balls, a few real ball swings.
    • Day 525 - 2026-03-10 Got some work in before lessons today (was going to play after but it decided to POUR). Then like three minutes in later on.
    • Day 2 (10 Mar 26) - Worked on weight shift feel using slap stick drill (hands about 6” apart - coming back weight on trail foot - down - thru weight on lead foot….moved it to hitting chips w/9i playing what I call “leap frog” - hit 1st about 10yds, the next a couple past the 1st, for about 6 balls total.  Love it as the lies change, the distances vary making each swing slightly different. 
    • The first post is here:   Do you have an overly long backswing that ruins sequencing and leads to poor shots? In nearly 20 years of teaching, I've found 5 common faults. You don't have to swing like Jon Rahm, but a shorter swing will probably help you #PlayBetter golf. Which is your fatal flaw? #1 - Trail Elbow Bend Average golfers ♥️ bending their trail elbows. It can feel powerful! Tour players bend their trail elbows MUCH less. A wider trail elbow creates a longer hand path and preserves structure. It also forces more chest turn; not everything longer is bad! Overly bending your trail elbow can wreak havoc on your swing. It pulls your arms across/beside your body. It requires more time to get the elbow bend "out," ruining your sequencing. The lead arm often bends and low point control is destroyed. The misconception is that it will create more speed, but that's often the opposite of what happens. Golfers often feel they swing "easier" but FASTER with wider trail elbows. Want to play better golf with a shorter backswing? Don't bend your elbow so much. #2 - Hip (Pelvis) Turn I see this all the time: a golfer's hips are only 5-10° open at impact, but he turns them back 60°+ in the backswing. Unless your father is The Flash, your hips are probably not getting 40° open at impact from there! That's more rotation than Rory! Golfers who over-rotate their pelvis often over-turn everything - trail thigh/knee, chest/shoulders, etc. They have more work to do in the same ~0.3 seconds as a Tour player who turns back ~40° and turns through to impact 40° or so. Want to shorten the pelvis turn a bit? Learn to internally rotate into the trail hip, externally rotate away from the lead hip, and do "less" with your knees (extending and flexing) in the backswing. Learn some separation between chest and pelvis. #3 - Rolled Inside and Lifted Up Amateurs love to send the club (and their arms) around them. You see the red golfer here all the time at your local range. The problem? Your arms mostly take the club UP, not around. Going around creates no height until you have to hoist the club up in the air because you're halfway through your backswing and the club is waist high and three feet behind your butt! 😄  Learn to use your arms properly. Arms = up/down, body = around. Most golfers learn how little their arms really have to do in the backswing. The picture here is all you've gotta do (but maybe with a properly sized club!). #4 - Wide Takeaway Width is good, no? Yes, if you're wide at the right time and in the right spots. Golfers seeking width often don't hinge the club much early in the backswing… forcing them to hinge it late. Hinging the club late puts a lot of momentum into the club, wrists, and elbow just before we need to make a hairpin turn in transition and go the other direction at the start of the downswing. When you're driving into a hairpin curve, you go into it slowly and accelerate out of it. Waiting to hinge is like coasting down the straightaway and accelerating into the hairpin. Your car ends up off the road, and your golf ball off the course. Give hinging at a faster rate (earlier) then coasting to the top a try. You'll be able to accelerate out of the hairpin without the momentum of the arms and club pulling in the wrong direction.   #5 - Sway and Tilt Some sway is good but sometimes I see a golfer who just… keeps… swaying… Their chest leans forward a bit for balance, resulting in a whole lotta lean. The green line below is the GEARS "virtual spine." Pros sway a bit, but stay ~90°. This sway often combines with the extra pelvis turn because this golfer is not putting ANY limits on what the "middle of them" (their pelvis) is doing in the backswing. These golfers spend a lot of energy just to get back to neutral! The best players begin pushing forward EARLY in the backswing. Often before the club gets much past their trail foot! Pushing forward (softly) first stops your backward sway and then begins to get your body moving toward the target. Push softly, but early!  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.