Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Solheim Cup Controversy: Who is more at fault?


Note: This thread is 3721 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Solheim Cup Controversy: Who is more at fault?

    • Alison Lee
      45
    • Suzann Pettersen
      32
    • Charley Hull
      6
    • Carin Koch
      4


Recommended Posts

Posted
Replaying the chip shot should have never happened either. But two wrongs don't make a right. i never saw the tape on the replay, but I'm sure Annika thought she was away. Making her redo the shot was also a bad call.

—Adam

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Big-picture, I'll bet Europe wishes it hadn't made a fuss since otherwise they likely would've won the Cup.  This shot controversy pissed off Team USA and seemingly inspired them to victory.


Posted

Big-picture, I'll bet Europe wishes it hadn't made a fuss since otherwise they likely would've won the Cup.  This shot controversy pissed off Team USA and seemingly inspired them to victory.

I agree, it fired the USA ladies up and got them to rally as a team.  I still believe Lee should have known better than to pick up the ball without verifying the putt was conceded.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

In the end I think fault on picking up the ball when she shouldn't is Lee. In the end confirm it with the opponent if you have to.

On a side note. Petterson was very unsportsmanlike to just walk off like that. It first game the opinion that the hole was over.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'll just echo what @JazzFatCat said about the rules official. He sounded informed, fair and impartial (he was American, I believe), citing the same decision above. He said he could only use that decision IF the Europeans had made some sort of statement.

He spoke with everyone involved- players, caddies, (I think even the nearby captains/assistant captains)- so that he could understand what statement was made to see if there was a reasonable interpretation to think it was a concession.

But there was no confirmed statement at all. Decision was therefore not applicable due to the wording, according to him. Take that for what it's worth, but that's the gist of what I heard in his forthright interview with Kay Cockerill.

I agree with the general anti-SP stuff here, but I won't go as far as to say she has disgraced golf.

I think there are two scenarios:

1. SP planned it and tried to get Lee to think it was conceded. Then she'd call her out on the penalty. I'm not ready to believe SP did this. That would be a disgrace.

2. SP walked off the green prematurely (poor sportsmanship) and looking back, realized a concession was not made. Oops, but then she noticed the pickup, and she felt compelled to call it.

In either case, SP comes off looking less than great, but scenario 2 is quite a bit less of an indictment on her.

What I'm not clear about is whether or not the Europeans, once Lee was called out, could have allowed Lee to replace the ball and play the shot without penalty. Some smart people here have said that could have happened.

But once SP made the point that no concession was made, wasn't the rules official in charge of the ruling and the Europeans really couldn't influence that decision? I'm really interested to hear thoughts on that as I think that would have been the best result.

But bottom line, USA did make the mistake, so we cannot blame anyone else. It comes off as sour grapes to put fault on SP, even if there was unsportsmanlike behavior. I voted Lee was "more at fault."

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

To me, turning their backs and walking off the green toward the next hole was a reasonable indication that the Euros conceded the putt. But to turn around and say no, they hadn't. Put the ball back  and putt it. They have video and they can put it back to pretty much the exact location without much delay. Poor sportsmanship on the part of the Euros.

And if 2000 is the reason, 15 years is a long time to hold a grudge.

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yeah this is clearly on Lee for picking up the ball because she thought she heard someone say good.Now if I was the europeans I wouldnt want to win the hole because of that and would just say thats good no problem but not sure if rules allow that.

  • Moderator
Posted
Unsportsmanlike move on the part of the European team, but ultimately it was still Lee who made the mistake. I also agree they should have just let her replace the ball and putt it.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Forget the rule. How would you want to be treated? There are less aggressive ways to want to win.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Forget the rule. How would you want to be treated? There are less aggressive ways to want to win.

Yea and I believe Juli Inkster brought that up. It's just not something you should do to your peers, I believe is what she said. It's a respect and sportsmanship issue IMO.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Lee is ultimately at fault. If you're not 100% sure, putt the ball out.

But, the Europeans should have let her putt it or conceded it after the fact. Walking off the green like that while there is still a stroke to be played is bad sportsmanship and bad etiquette. Personally, if I'm in that situation in match play (i.e., an opponent picks up a putt like that without me conceding it), I will either just say that I conceded it or give them a chance to putt it. If the Euros had stayed still and tried to stop Lee, then they're totally in the right. Walking off the green like that though really grinds my gears. Also, if they were going to concede it anyway, which I think they said afterwards, they should have just said they conceded it. Taking advantage of something like that goes against the spirit of the game.

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Regardless it had instant karmic consequences. SP got curb stomped by the worst player on the U.S. Team. And Hull she seemed rattled, probably easily their best player had to deal with the weight and got beat in singles. If I was on team US SP would get a box of fancy peaches and grapes on me.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

For what ever it is worth I think Lee had every right to believe the putt had been conceded the way the Petterson and Hull walked off the green.  So since, apparently, it has not been conceded Lee should have replaced the ball and putted out.  But I think the rules guys got it wrong.

Butch


Posted

What I'm not clear about is whether or not the Europeans, once Lee was called out, could have allowed Lee to replace the ball and play the shot without penalty. Some smart people here have said that could have happened.

But once SP made the point that no concession was made, wasn't the rules official in charge of the ruling and the Europeans really couldn't influence that decision? I'm really interested to hear thoughts on that as I think that would have been the best result.

That would be ideal, but I don't think it's an option once the mistake is made.  The Euros would have had to basically lie to the official and say that they made a "statement"...which they didn't.

Just my view of it.

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

While the Europeans claim it wasn't done intentionally, they had an opportunity to concede it post hole and chose not to.  If it was me and that was not a strategy I planned on using to "steal" a hole I'd concede it anyway.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yeah this was a three card monte move. In a bar sure, on the world stage in a contest that is as much about goodwill as anything it's poor form. This is not a time to cite obscure rules most never face. Golf, professional golf, should be bigger than this.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3721 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.