Jump to content
IGNORED

What's Worse: 50 Yds Away in Rough or 100 Ft Putt?


buttputt40
Note: This thread is 1575 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I'll take the 100 foot putt.  I can get down in three from there.  50 yards away, in the rough, may not offer any sort of shot at all.  There are exceptions, of course, but I'd rather be on the green.

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I consider myself an above average putter, so I would putt, rather than pitch from 50 yards, no matter what the lie conditions are. Out of the rough, or not.  It wouldn't matter. 

The old saying if you can putt , then putt. If you can't putt, then chip. If you can't chip, then pitch rings true every time. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Ask the question this way...

...which is better, 150’ away from a bad lie, or 100’ away from a perfect lie?

Case closed.

 

  • Like 4

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

The putt.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sometimes out of rough you can get within 10 feet which would be 2 shots.

It probably is a tie because the odds of a good

strike out of rough is only half at best, especially with climate change

making the grass grow higher. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

In all but the strangest of circumstances I'd rather putt than chip.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

 

2 hours ago, buttputt40 said:

Sometimes out of rough you can get within 10 feet which would be 2 shots.

It probably is a tie because the odds of a good

strike out of rough is only half at best, especially with climate change

making the grass grow higher. 

2 hours ago, boogielicious said:

The putt.

 

No no no no no. This is so wrong. It has absolutely nothing to do with climate change.

The 50 yd shot out of the rough is worse than a 100 ft putt and its not even close.

 

On the PGA tour in 2018, from 50-75yds in the rough, the average proximity to the hole was 25 feet. 

There were some very very good players with short games much better than you and I that averaged over 30 ft proximity to the hole (Dustin Johnson 31' 4", Francesco Molinari 30' 3", Patrick Reed 36' 10")

That means for amateurs the proximity number is 40+ feet easily.

If you, as an amateur hit a ball within 10 feet when you are 50 yds away in the rough, that is a very very good shot and an outlier compared to average for amateurs. There is also a decent chance for an amateur to miss the green completely, which would likely mean another 2-3 shots to get in the hole. 

PGA pros need an average of just under 2 putts (1.92 ish) to get the ball in the hole from 25 feet. They aren't going to miss the green very often from 50 yds, but I'm sure it happens, so lets say thats like 1.05 strokes on average to get on the green for PGA tour players from 50 yds in the rough.

Add those numbers up, 2.97 strokes on average, so basically 3 strokes on average for PGA tour players to get the ball in the hole from 50 yds. 

The PGA tour stats doesnt show data on 100 foot putts, but it is highly unlikely that PGA tour players are averaging over 3 putts to hole out from 100 ft on the green. They probably 3 putt a lot, but there is also a good amount of the time where they 2 putt, and the only way that the average could rise over 3 is with four-putts, and there were only 89 four-putts out of 6896 rounds on the PGA tour in 2018 (Only one four-putt for every 77 rounds played)

When putting from 60 feet, it takes PGA tour players on average 2.21 strokes to get the ball in the hole, so even adding .15 for every 10 ft back until you reach 100 ft, that would still only be 2.81 strokes on average to get the ball in the hole when putting from 100 feet, and its likely that every 10 feet adds something closer to .10 strokes, which would put the average closer to 2.61 for PGA tour players. Split the difference and let's call it 2.75 strokes.

That is basically a quarter of a shot less to get the ball in the hole when putting from 100 ft vs in the rough from 50 yds, and these are players with the best short games in the world.

Amateurs are probably close to 3.5 strokes from 50 yds in the rough, because they'll miss the green a decent amount of the time, and if they get it on the green in 1 shot and hit their average proximity of 40 feet, there's still a 30% chance that a 90-golfer would 3 putt from there, which would mean getting in the hole in 4 shots from 50 yds out in the rough.

If a 90-golfer has a 100 ft putt and leaves the first putt 20 feet short, a 90-golfer will three putt 8% of the time from 20 feet. 90-golfers average 2.51 strokes from 60 feet, so even if you add .2 strokes for every 10 feet you go back, that is 3.31 strokes for a 90-golfer when putting from 100 feet.  (3.1 strokes for a scratch golfer, which means that a scratch golfer putting from 100 feet and a PGA player from 50 yds in the rough are almost identical on average.)

 

It's not even close. Being 50 yds away in the rough is statistically worse than having a 100 foot putt. 

Edited by klineka
  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Driver: :callaway: Rogue Max ST LS
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood/3Hybrid
Irons: :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   MD5 54 58 degree  
Putter: :odyssey:  White Hot RX #1
Ball: :srixon: Z Star XV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, buttputt40 said:

Sometimes out of rough you can get within 10 feet which would be 2 shots. It probably is a tie because the odds of a good strike out of rough is only half at best, especially with climate change making the grass grow higher. 

Expected Strokes from 100 FT is around 2.60. Expected Strokes from 50 yards in the rough is around 2.88.

PGA Tour players will average around 20 FT from the rough at 50 yards. So, expecting 10 FT would be exceptional.

To answer the OP, I would take a 100 FT putt.

16 minutes ago, klineka said:

The PGA tour stats doesnt show data on 100 foot putts, but it is highly unlikely that PGA tour players are averaging over 3 putts to hole out from 100 ft on the green. They probably 3 putt a lot, but there is also a good amount of the time where they 2 putt, and the only way that the average could rise over 3 is with four-putts, and there were only 89 four-putts out of 6896 rounds on the PGA tour in 2018 (Only one four-putt for every 77 rounds played)

I would guess they would average around 10 FT on their lag putt. Extrapolating the 100 FT length from Every Shot Counts, the expected strokes is around 2.6. Take a stroke off that for the first putt and you get around the expected strokes for a 10 FT. This is a rough estimate, but it's probably close. Inside 10% the distance of your putt over 40 FT is a good goal for lag putting.

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

@buttputt40 is some weird sort of troll, posting nonsense type stuff and yet people take it seriously.

11 hours ago, David in FL said:

Ask the question this way...

...which is better, 150’ away from a bad lie, or 100’ away from a perfect lie?

Case closed.

This.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

About the only time it would be anything other than the putt would be a crazy green where it is actually impossible to get the ball to the hole. Like one of those weird deals where you got a lot of fringe or rough between you and the hole and everything else is on a big down slope towards disaster.

You know, the sort of greens I wouldn't play if you paid me.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

9 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

About the only time it would be anything other than the putt would be a crazy green where it is actually impossible to get the ball to the hole. Like one of those weird deals where you got a lot of fringe or rough between you and the hole and everything else is on a big down slope towards disaster.

Even in that scenario if you had no choice but to putt sideways or something away from the hole and ended up at like 40 ft to the hole after your first putt, you'd still 2 putt that a decent amount of the time, which would be the same as pitching on from 50 yds to 40 ft.

Better yet, just do this 

 

Edited by klineka

Driver: :callaway: Rogue Max ST LS
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood/3Hybrid
Irons: :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   MD5 54 58 degree  
Putter: :odyssey:  White Hot RX #1
Ball: :srixon: Z Star XV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • iacas changed the title to What's Worse: 50 Yds Away in Rough or 100 Ft Putt?
14 hours ago, buttputt40 said:

I feel so great landing on the green but then I realize its a 100 foot putt. 

I’d rather be on the green with a 100 foot putt OR have a 50 yard putt. NOT BOTH 🤪

Hope this doesn’t happen too often though 😁

14 hours ago, Piz said:

I'll take the 100 foot putt.  I can get down in three from there.  50 yards away, in the rough, may not offer any sort of shot at all.  There are exceptions, of course, but I'd rather be on the green.

^^^

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

14 hours ago, Patch said:

The old saying if you can putt , then putt. If you can't putt, then chip. If you can't chip, then pitch rings true every time. 

This - a bad putt ends up as close as a great chip or pitch.

Bill - 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1575 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I kind of figured that might be part of the problem. I’m still guilty of it myself at times and you’re a better ballstriker than I am. I imagine the temptation to go for the flag grows as you get more control over your wedges. Might want to think about shot selection, too. I don’t know how you typically play short game shots but I see a lot of people default to hitting high pitch shots from basically everywhere, to every hole location, without regard for how the green is contoured and how the ball might release depending on where it lands. I know my short game has been steadily improving from expanding my shot selection, overall. Though to be honest, part of that is from necessity because I was really struggling with pitch shots so I started hitting more chips from everywhere, but it taught me a lot more about how to play short game shots in general. NP man. We’re all learning and improving together. It is a really good tool.
    • 2 rounds this weekend, one at my home course and another course that I know well.   Played well for 3 of the 4 nines.    Ended up with an 80 and an 88.  Breaking it down by 9, it was 38, 42, 41, and a tough 47 where I somehow ended up with chipping/pitching shanks where I dropped at least 6 strokes on the last 6 holes.
    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...