Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Is There a Reason for the 100-Foot High Approach Shot?


Note: This thread is 1978 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Or does it just look cool?

im old school, keep the ball as close to ground as possible and rolling on the green as soon as possible. That’s more accurate and better control than a 100 yard approach shot flying 100 feet high, if there’s water or a bunker in front of the green that’s different, I dont even own a hybrid or a lofted wedge! Old school!


Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, golfthyme said:

Or does it just look cool?

im old school, keep the ball as close to ground as possible and rolling on the green as soon as possible. That’s more accurate and better control than a 100 yard approach shot flying 100 feet high, if there’s water or a bunker in front of the green that’s different, I dont even own a hybrid or a lofted wedge! Old school!

Just be aware that repeated "Old School" references are a veiled technique to achieve carte blanche in opinions that are denigrating and run counter to modern thinking.  It's a way of making a statement and then washing your hands of the responsibility of it by claiming "Old School".  Trying to be diplomatic here in reference your other stances, on items other than golf.

Edited by Double Mocha Man

Posted

A valid question which I posed to myself yesterday while playing.  I was 85 yard out from the green w/o any trouble either side of the green.   I paused for several seconds thinking about my club choice.   Should I hit a bump and run or a 3/4 sand wedge?   Since there was no real danger except length, I chose to bump and run a pitching wedge which worked well.     I believe it was the safer shot in this instance.  

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The high approaches is more about being able to use a full or near full swing for me. Find it harder distance control on half swing but I am still experimenting. I am actually currently trying to convert to a chip and runner. I even removed my lob wedge from my bag. Dispersion wise left to right is probably a bit better and distance a bit worse. I must say its a booring defensive shot but safer for sure. That said to simple shots I sometimes miss due to underestimating them. Its ridiculous how you can miss the simplest pitches sometimes. A full shot with my 50/56 wedges do require my full attention. 


Posted

It depends upon the course. Sometimes I might want to hit a 100' high approach shot that sticks on the green. Sometimes, if the fairway is trimmed tight and conditions are dry I might even want to putt it from 100 feet out.

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Anything outside of 75 yards, I want to bring it in high because I typically will hit a full shot.  Now, inside of 75, getting a bit too close for my LW so I tend to hit knock down type shots which will come in lower.  If I can't reach a green, I prefer to be 75 yards or more out so I can hit a full shot.  I hate 30 or 40 yard shots, especially over bunkers.  

Bag: Titleist
Driver: TM RBZ 9.5
Fairway metals: TM RBZ 3 wood
Hybrids: TM RBZ 3, 4 and 5
Irons: TM Burner 1.0 6 thru LW stiff steel shafts
Putter: Ping B60
Ball: TM Tour Preferred X or ProV1x
Check out littlejohngolfleague.com  A Greater Houston TX traveling golf league.


Posted
5 hours ago, RickK said:

If I can't reach a green, I prefer to be 75 yards or more out so I can hit a full shot.  I hate 30 or 40 yard shots, especially over bunkers.  

May I make a suggestion?  Learn how to hit those.  Figure out for your wedges what your half swing gets distance wise;  there's a good chance that after a little bit of practice, you'll get the ball closer from 30-40 yards than you do from 75 yards. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
19 hours ago, golfthyme said:

Or does it just look cool?

im old school, keep the ball as close to ground as possible and rolling on the green as soon as possible. That’s more accurate and better control than a 100 yard approach shot flying 100 feet high, if there’s water or a bunker in front of the green that’s different, I dont even own a hybrid or a lofted wedge! Old school!

Are you using a brassie and pitch with a niblick with hickory shafts? Or are you talking first gen metal woods, 50* degree pitching wedge, maybe a 55* sand wedge and a bullseye putter with a wound ball old school? How do you feel about graphite shafts? I think of old school today as traditional lofts on normal sized irons along with a quality spin ball. I carry a hybrid, but its an Adams Pro Gold. 

The high lofted shot suits me when carrying a bunker with the pin tucked. I also will use it on a tiered green if the tier you are trying to get to is tight and you want to avoid hitting a severe slope and killing the shot.  With that said, I prefer flighting the ball with my wedges especially into the wind. I don't try to hit it as low as possible from 100 yards, but tend to hit a controlled and predictable trajectory with a nice amount of spin. Many times, I am in what many consider to be "x" wedge range, I hit a lower lofted wedge for control.  To become a better player you need to be able to hit a variety of shots and then know when to play them. I try to play using the don't hit it higher than you need to philosophy.  

 

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted

The way courses are built today it is imperative to hit the  ball in the air. I have been playing since 1962 and back then it was easy to keep the ball on the ground, but not today with all the sand traps and water hazards in front of the green and behind it. 


Posted
2 minutes ago, shanksalot said:

The way courses are built today it is imperative to hit the  ball in the air.

Ditto that. also wanted to mention green design in modern courses.
I played a new course this past week which left me very lengthy putts when my approach shots
landed in the wrong zones of the greens.

It wasn't due to poor shot selection, but lack of knowledge of the greens.
One was a really good shot into the middle of the green and just rolled off the hump in the other direction.

Being my first time playing this course, I could not tell from the fairway these greens had these massive undulations.
It made for some challenging putts which was fun. LOL

Johnny Rocket - Let's Rock and Roll and play some golf !!!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yeah. Pretty crazy. I like to keep mine at about 95’ high. Anything over that is just for vanity. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, CarlSpackler said:

Yeah. Pretty crazy. I like to keep mine at about 95’ high. Anything over that is just for vanity. 

... or gets lost in low hanging clouds.  "Yes, I uploaded my golf ball to the cloud."

  • Like 2
  • Informative 1

  • Moderator
Posted
5 hours ago, CarlSpackler said:

Yeah. Pretty crazy. I like to keep mine at about 95’ high. Anything over that is just for vanity. 

Yeah, I keep mine 93-96. 100 is just for posers.

5 hours ago, Double Mocha Man said:

... or gets lost in low hanging clouds.  "Yes, I uploaded my golf ball to the cloud."

I’m about 10 miles from Logan International. They asked me to keep it down for safety.

  • Like 3
  • Upvote 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My peak height is around 110’ what the hell is wrong with that?

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

We track that instead of closest to the pin.

Craig
What's in the :ogio: Silencer bag (on the :clicgear: cart)
Driver: :callaway: Razr Fit 10.5°  
5 Wood: :tmade: Burner  
Hybrid: :cobra: Baffler DWS 20°
Irons: :ping: G400 
Wedge: :ping: Glide 2.0 54° ES grind 
Putter: :heavyputter:  midweight CX2
:aimpoint:,  :bushnell: Tour V4

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, boogielicious said:

Yeah, I keep mine 93-96. 100 is just for posers.

I’m about 10 miles from Logan International. They asked me to keep it down for safety.

Ha! Good one, @boogielicious. Mine hang in the air so long I had to register my ball on the FAA drone website!  😄

  • Thumbs Up 1

Note: This thread is 1978 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.