Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Good idea for an award.  Not so easy to do.

My 76 on Sunday still didn't get there.  The par 5s were no problem, but one tee shot in the water on #11 and I'm out of the running.

It's really about 'clean' golf more than going low.  (and no sandbagging at 'exec' courses, IMHO).  Good par 5s, sure. For me, though, it's about not making a 'big' mistake on a Par 4 - seems I get 6's on 4's more than on 5's.  weird.

This should be fun to track.  Plenty of season left to try.

(I've also completely forgotten about catching a LW pitch on video, gotta get the cell phone out and do that too)

Edited by rehmwa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I did it this past Monday: https://www.ushandicap.com/golf-handicap/scores_detail.asp?scoreID=154373157.  It was also my 20th round in the 70s this year (and my goal was 15 or better, after   I achieved only 9 and 10 rounds in the 70s last year and the year before). I see that there at least another 2 similar rounds (one for 78 and another for 75) at the same course in my last 20, with no 6s.

I played another round since (shot 81) and it had 3 6s:  2 on par 5s, with a bad chip following a bad approach, and a double on a par 4, following a really poor tee shot which was fortunately still in bounds, but led to a layup, a sand shot and the typical 2 putts. SMH.

In other words, it's doable, but it's not "easy".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, onthehunt526 said:

So hit your 2-hybrid with the blue PURE Grip on it. It's not cheating... It's just a knowing your shot zones.

@iacas

I've actually got those sweet sweet PURE groups on all my clubs cept the putter.

Oh, and I can push slice that hybrid across the ocean.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, sjduffers said:

Never mind, it was Wednesday, i.e. just 2 days ago (and I can't remember when... that should tell you something about my "mental" ability :-D)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, sjduffers said:

In other words, it's doable, but it's not "easy".

Congrats, even if you can't count backward two days. :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, colin007 said:

I've actually got those sweet sweet PURE groups on all my clubs cept the putter.

Oh, and I can push slice that hybrid across the ocean.

Just like we are demonstrating a proper shoulder height drop. 

I guess the point is not to put yourself in a spot were you will make a six. Near greens are important on Par 4s, GIR are almost a must on Par 5s, they aren't as important on Par 3s, basically keep the ball in front of you and advance it safely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Lihu said:

Just missed a 5 footer for bogey on a par 5 :-(

Even if you had made it you wouldn't have met the challenge…?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

19 minutes ago, iacas said:

Even if you had made it you wouldn't have met the challenge…?

Actually, I meant that I missed my par putt for a bogey. Punctuation was missing because I blogged on the course today. :whistle:

 

In any case, it's going to take getting used to my new distance off the tee. Obstacles that weren't before, now are. :hmm: My best drive carried into a tree on the 10th and that's when I decided to pack it in. My second best drive hit a sprinkler head and bounced backwards. I know it hit the sprinkler because it jumped up about 30 feet in the air. All my other drives made these beautiful flights right into a tree. Somehow I had no trouble finding them. . . I had a simple chip from a tiny bunker situated above the hole for an eagle, which I bladed because of a clump of grass growing in the smallest bunker on the course and possibly in all of So. Cal. and turned that into a bogey too.

This challenge is really tough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 hours ago, mchepp said:

I am gonna try my best to get the award this weekend. I love the idea.

You don't always try your best? :-D 

P.S.  My 81 today included 3 sixes...  :8)

Edited by David in FL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, David in FL said:

You don't always try your best? :-D 

We're padding our caps for a reason. ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, phillyk said:

We're padding our caps for a reason. ;-)

Since you're still a +1, I might be able to give you some pointers!  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

This challenge is right in line with my typical mental strategy of playing a round, I just word it differently... 5 or Better.  I started doing it back when my goal was to become a bogey golfer (18 fives is a 90), and have just continued with the same mentality (knowing today the pars and birdies will happen, while avoiding the blow up holes).

I think it's a great challenge/goal to focus on!  Good luck to everyone!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

For me, this really depends on getting off the tee. If I get off the tee and have somewhat of a clear shot to the green, I have a good chance of accomplishing this. The problem is on every tee, I have a really really good chance of hitting it off the planet - with virtually any club.

Edited by colin007
Forgot something

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

445544435-455444355-77

I think this is a really good challenge. As others have said, it means keeping the ball in play. Penalty strokes will make this nearly impossible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

This is a good goal to have when I play golf.  Quite often I will hit the ball really well all day, but will inevitably take a 6, 7, or 8 somewhere.  A recent round I played, I shot a 76 with one triple and one double in the round.   I had three birdies also....but it seems to happen every time I play.  The 6 was a 4 putt on a par 4.  Still can't believe I did that...

The triple bogey was the result of a bladed chip around the green and then a comeback chip that was to a hole on a severe down slope...3 putts later I took a triple...after splitting the fairway perfectly and hitting an approach that only landed a few feet from the green. 

It is all about concentration and not letting that happen on the course.  It catches me almost every time.  My best rounds(obviously) are ones without 6's in them.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, DaveP043 said:

445544435-455444355-77

I think this is a really good challenge. As others have said, it means keeping the ball in play. Penalty strokes will make this nearly impossible.

Was this a round since the Challenge was issued? Are you claiming the achievement?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • I no longer belong to a club, just two groups of golf buddies who love to play everywhere we can anytime we can. But I have had memberships at two. The first was very plush. Everybody who was anybody belonged there, don't you know. Not like that other club across town where "Aren't they mostly just salesmen"? It was almost impossible to break in there unless your grandparents were members. But I learned to play there and had great lessons from a pro's pro...The thin, tan, squinty-eyed cigarette-smoking guy you just knew was a pro. He turned a slicer into a guy who fought a hook for years. Years later, I joined an old, kind of run-down club. It was very historic and had some great pro golfers associated with it in their formative years. Dues were cheap. Members were oilmen, small business guys, lawyers, carpenters, plumbers, bankers, mechanics, retired policemen, clerks and outlaws...You name it. But it never mattered what you did for a living or who you were on the course or in the 19th hole. They had 3 or 4 money games each week. You put up your money and you played. There were team scores, individual scores, points for everything under the sun. You learned to get the ball in the hole anyway you could. And you got good fast or you found yourself out a lot (well, it seemed like a lot) of cash. Certainly, the payouts were pretty good when you won. Unfortunately, the course has gone the way of real estate development and is no more. Guess which one I miss most? Regards to all, -Marv
    • That's dumb. If you are "developing your swing" it's made better by the right amount of feedback. And > 1/2 of the time, the "feedback" doesn't even really include what the ball does. The ball flight takes care of itself. It is. Significantly so. From 140 yards, the gap in fairway vs. rough is a fifth of a shot. From 160, a quarter of a shot. There you go again putting words in my mouth, or (willfully?) mis-remembering stuff. I've pointed out the opposite many times: that the advances in equipment have narrowed the gap between players like Tiger and his peers. You couldn't mis-hit a muscleback 2-iron. You can mis-hit a 3-hybrid a little and still do okay. The gap in skill has been artificially reduced. Jack says it. Tiger says it. I've said it. Of course the modern ball is the "best" BALL "ever." But I've never said it's the best thing for the game, or makes the game most interesting, or whatever you're actually trying to say. 0 for 2 there @Jack Watson. Sorry. Yet… you were wrong. They didn't. They hit down. They launched the ball too low, and with too much spin.
    • The bottom line is very simple.  If you are developing your swing or a students is it made better by more or less feedback?  I recommend anyone developing to use the highest spin balls they can find because it gives more feedback. Higher spinning ball is more feedback.  Tour players today would hit straighter with a ball just like a Pinnacle.  Rocks were available back in the day.  No spin isn't what pros want in a ball.  They don't choose no spin because of many reasons. Often players now aim at rough because it's often not what anyone would call rough.  I think it's obvious that I was not making a statistical argument there just pointing out a tendency in the modern game that shows how course setup is weak/favors bomb and gouge brainless golf.  Rough is supposed to be harder to hit from than fairway.  That's also lost on modern gamers for the most part. Joro will agree,  he was there.  A higher spin ball helps separate wheat from chaff.  So many pros agree on these points...You seem to be somewhat alone in your contention that modern golf is the best thing ever... Anyways I have to go so no more time now for this...  I used caps because it's insulting to people to tell them they didn't know what they were doing. Again Best wishes to all for a safe holiday!
    • You can't go back to that, because pros could simply play a 1997 Pinnacle and hit it long and straight. The only thing about the new ball is that they made the 1997 Pinnacle spin more with shorter clubs. So wrap a 1997 Pinnacle in some softer outer layers, and bam, you've accomplished nothing. Balls are better now. So are clubs. So is the understanding that pros have to how important power is in the game. No, it's correct. When players first got launch monitors, the vast majority were hitting down too much, generating too much spin, and effectively hitting ballooning, rising shots. The Frank Nobilo piece, for example, says: So no, it's not arrogant or incorrect. It's perfectly valid. Nobody said anything about gear effect. Yell about it then. Sorry, no. You're simply and provably wrong here. Where do you come up with this bullshit? The rest I've left alone as it's your opinion and that's fine, but don't just spout out shit like it's fact when it's not, please.
    • I know  for myself as a golf fan I want to be able to watch golf and have it entertain me.  There's really only three tournaments anymore I pay attention to Masters British and US Open.  The last couple years the US has been a dud but I keep watching hoping it will once again become the ultimate test. I want to see the best quality golf.  I think that's where this whole discussion of distance comes in.  Nicklaus Snead et all for the most part could swing much faster than they did.  Sometimes they would bash one but not usually.  Hogan did some long drive stuff at times early on and he was puttin the wood to it espescially for his height.  In order to score best these guys played a golf swing that was not maxed out because the ball spun so much that slight misfits were truly bad you had to manage the strike just right at high speed to keep spin down and get the launch right or it would be an embarrassing balloon ballflight.   They were playing the game of skill not the game of maximum speed alone.  Very self disciplined approach.  It kinda makes me mad when I hear younger folks say "part of the reason for the distance now is that players understand launch conditions better" Really?  To me it's preposterous to try to assert that modern players only in the last few years learned launch conditions.  It's also arrogant and incorrect.  Like gear effect also.  Heel low cuts and toe draws were shots people practiced with balata back to Jackie Burke! THE BALATA PLAYERS WERE MASTERS OF SPIN COMPARED TO THE GUYS NOW!  TO SAY THAT THEY DID NOT KNOW WHAT THEY WERE DOING IS ABSOLUTELY VERY VERY INSULTING TO THEM AND ANYONE WHO IS CONNECTED WITH THEM!   They were masters because the higher spinning ball gave them much better feedback while developing their swings.  You have to know how to create certain launch conditions to get that balata out there like Norman or Nicklaus or whoever.  Maybe they did not know their numbers on Doppler but they ALL knew who could do it and who couldn't and more I,portent how THEY did it.  Now they are all bashing it because there's no reason not to.  The ball  doesn't spin as much and the clubs are forgiving.  The courses are setup so that being in the 'rough' is better than the fairway. You get brain dead robots like DJ out there hitting miles.  Where's the variation and challenge?  Where are the courses made to challenge the modern technology?  It's not good for the tour to make the game into a distance contest.  They are marketing the thing poorly and results have been showing and will show the next few years as more and more courses close. Golf with a higher spinning ball would be so cool to even watch on tv with shot tracer.  That's what golfers used to aspire to the low launch and correct shape.  They might not hit as far as pros but the shaping that's what's been totally lost today. I think with a game focused on power and distance over self control and skill you get a bore.  With most tour stops it's like watching a Ferrari F1 car racing a guy in a Prius.  (The Prius being the course.) A golfer with the skill of Corey Pavin simply couldn't make it today and that's sad.  Guy was a great competitor striker of the ball.  He was shaping fw wood shots into greens.  You don't see that stuff anymore and really the younger crowd doesn't know what they don't know.   To me the whole game of golf boils down to decisions and self knowledge and control and is made more interesting the more difficult the course gets.   With the modern week to week game with older courses and modern clubs it's basically a free minus six or more every week due to par fives alone for a good touring pro. This is a long rant to forgive me.  I just wish golf were more entertaining now.  It's largely not.  I'd like to see the pros have to face the challenge of a higher spinning ball and takeaway Some for and max volume on drivers and fw clubs.  The reason for this is I want to see what kind of level mankind can reach in this game.  I want to see the best quality.  IMO the way the game is goin is wrong for that.  It's a putting contest now.  They all bash it they all hit greens it's just who gets a hot putter. I wanna make it more challenging and truly separate the wheat from the chaff.  To me that would be more interesting. Or we can just leave things as they are and really never know what a great golfer is truly capable of because the game now really doesn't require that skill anymore.  Heck just carry a driver some short irons and wedges and a putter.   Sorry for the rant but many of us get angry when it's said that modern players have been taught new things by trackman.  Sorry guys,  equal some Nicklaus or Hogan or Knudson et all scores with balata then you can talk.  That's real feedback hit ball watch ball.  Ball no do what you want do something else! Happy Holidays!      
  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. DeadMan
      DeadMan
      (31 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.