Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Grades for Tiger's Performance (Hero 2017)


Note: This thread is 2929 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, tdiii said:

I was a bit disturbed when a reporter asked him after his first round if she'd seen him take Advil during that round, to which he said yes.  But then he lied, saying he wasn't in pain but it was just his doctor's orders.  No way.  A MD might tell you to take advil if you were having symptoms but wouldn't just have you take it if all was great.  So, that bears watching. 

Nah, you can just take ibuprofen to proactively limit inflammation. If you're worried about swelling, it makes sense to take. We have a few doctors on here, and I think they'd back me up. There are benefits to advil beyond limiting pain.

On Tiger's grade, I give him an A, personally. 3 rounds under par after almost a year off is really good. I don't think there was anything out there that worried me for his comeback. Long game was good and can probably still get better. Obviously, long way to go with short game, but that always happens with Tiger when he's focusing on his full swing.

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

A.

I was really expecting him to play it safe and just pat pat the ball around. Really impressed with how much speed he was able to generate and the swing looked so controlled.

 

7 minutes ago, DeadMan said:

Nah, you can just take ibuprofen to proactively limit inflammation. If you're worried about swelling, it makes sense to take. We have a few doctors on here, and I think they'd back me up. There are benefits to advil beyond limiting pain.

+1. Was just about to comment on this. If he was in pain I seriously doubt he would be playing and risking even further injury again.

Edited by Alx

Posted

A

What more could he ask for?

Id go A plus but for a little wooden on some short shots.

If he’s healthy not saying it’s his A game but he deserves an A for first time out

Glad to watch him play golf and hope he stays healthy for years


Posted

A.  Even with the limited field he played better than and nearly equal to younger guys in their prime. Just one tournament but it’s difficult to imagine anyone but Tiger doing that. 

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

A.

He played injury-free, made a lot of great shots, has a few things to work on, but overall, for his first time back in a long time, I thought he did great. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
15 hours ago, billchao said:

B, which is remarkable considering he's been on the shelf for a year or more. I'm not grading on a curve just because of his injuries.

Agree.  He played well for not having competed in a long time, but he finished in the middle of a very limited field, at a relatively benign layout.

B.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I would give him an A. I don't think it's realistic to expect him to come out and win, which at his best would be the only thing that qualified for an A, so if you want to say I'm grading him on a curve then go for it. 

I didn't really see any negatives here. He drove it really pretty well. A couple of loose ones, but those have always been there. He's edging his way back into competition and it's going to take a little time to settle down. He holed out really well and his speed control on the longer putts yesterday looked better. He hit a lot of good chips. He hit a couple of squirrely ones too, but he was not alone in that regard. He hit a lot of good iron shots. Finished -8 and shot three rounds in the 60s. I'd say that was pretty darn good. He had the magic going on Friday front nine. Let that get away a little on the back. I think once he gets his competition sharpness back, that will get better. I think this is very encouraging. I think he'll win again and if he improves like I think he might, I think he might win a lot.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Considering the dude hasn't really played competitively in the past 24 months, id give him a A for that. 

But grading soley on performance, id give him a B. The short game needs a little tightening up. 

F for on his color sense. That shirt he was wearing yesterday wasn't red...

Edited by Groucho Valentine

Posted

I would say a "B". 3 of 4 rounds below par. The one, over par round knocked him out of an"A" grade. 

No matter. Tiger has to feel really good about his play, after his past history of not playing. There are bigger, and tougher tests still a head for him. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

In the context of his last few years, a strong A, in comparison to his competitors this weekend a B. If he can improve his game and stay healthy, they should be pretty scared. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

I will have to go with A. Not A- nor A+. Old school grading would fall in the 93-97% range, and for a first outing, I think this is fair. I think he checked most if not all the boxes of things that would indicate his potential for future success. Pain free, finished top half of field, good driving and putting, good ball speed, 3 rounds under par.  Competitive in a field over which for the most part he has 10-15 years in age. There were media comments ad nauseam about the 75, but I think the whole field shot in the 70's on Saturday.

As time goes on, I would use a sharper grading scale, as I am sure would Tiger. He will not be satisfied long term with middle of the pack, but for this one event, I think it was better than anyone could expect. A great start.

Edited by dbuck
forgot about the no cut-took made cut out of comment

Don

In the bag:

Driver: PING 410 Plus 9 degrees, Alta CB55 S  Fairway: Callaway Rogue 3W PX Even Flow Blue 6.0; Hybrid: Titleist 818H1 21* PX Even Flow Blue 6.0;  Irons: Titleist 718 AP1 5-W2(53*) Shafts- TT AMT Red S300 ; Wedges Vokey SM8 56-10D Putter: Scotty Cameron 2016 Newport 2.5  Ball: Titleist AVX or 2021 ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
14 hours ago, JetFan1983 said:

Come on, man! Everyone said this guy was done. That he should retire and do something else. He just beat world no.1 Dustin Johnson by eight shots over four days! How am I grading on a curve? 

Dustin Johnson had a bad week and would have missed the cut had there been one. That doesn't raise Tiger's grade in my eyes. As @David in FL said, he finished in the middle of a limited field on a relatively easy course. He played above average golf and I gave him an above average grade.

I acknowledged that it was impressive for him to play that well, being away from competitive golf so long due to his injuries. That doesn't earn more favorable grading from me. I'd probably give him an "A" if he was actually in contention, but he played solid golf and I gave him a solid grade.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 minutes ago, billchao said:

Dustin Johnson had a bad week and would have missed the cut had there been one. That doesn't raise Tiger's grade in my eyes. As @David in FL said, he finished in the middle of a limited field on a relatively easy course. He played above average golf and I gave him an above average grade.

I acknowledged that it was impressive for him to play that well, being away from competitive golf so long due to his injuries. That doesn't earn more favorable grading from me. I'd probably give him an "A" if he was actually in contention, but he played solid golf and I gave him a solid grade.

Yea but @David in FL is an irrational Tiger hater, everyone here knows that :-P

OK, fine. Mathematically, an A+ isn't a fair grade because if he had won, I couldn't give him a higher grade. But by that logic, your grade should be at least a B+, which would leave room for him being in contention and losing (A- or A) or outright winning (A+).

Aaaaaand, I've officially gone too far with this relatively innocuous thread topic :-D

PS- Still love ya, David! :beer:

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
19 hours ago, 70sSanO said:

Making the cut

certainly you needed to be in the top 18 in this field to make the cut......

 

A.  Can't wait to see if he can now build on it though

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 minutes ago, JetFan1983 said:

Yea but @David in FL is an irrational Tiger hater, everyone here knows that :-P

OK, fine. Mathematically, an A+ isn't a fair grade because if he had won, I couldn't give him a higher grade. But by that logic, your grade should be at least a B+, which would leave room for him being in contention and losing (A- or A) or outright winning (A+).

Aaaaaand, I've officially gone too far with this relatively innocuous thread topic :-D

PS- Still love ya, David! :beer:

Hey, hey, hey!

I'm a rational Tiger hater! :-D 

Honestly impressed with his play this past week, though I'll cheerfully admit that I enjoyed watching Saturday more than the other 3 days. ;-) 

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Considering he seemed to play 72 holes pain free and was competitive against the best players in the world, I give him an A. Whether you like Tiger or not it is hard not to see his importance to the game. I hope he is able to play more from this point.

Danny    In my :ping: Hoofer Tour golf bag on my :clicgear: 8.0 Cart

Driver:   :pxg: 0311 Gen 5  X-Stiff.                        Irons:  :callaway: 4-PW APEX TCB Irons 
3 Wood: :callaway: Mavrik SZ Rogue X-Stiff                            Nippon Pro Modus 130 X-Stiff
3 Hybrid: :callaway: Mavrik Pro KBS Tour Proto X   Wedges: :vokey:  50°, 54°, 60° 
Putter: :odyssey:  2-Ball Ten Arm Lock        Ball: :titleist: ProV 1

 

 

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
21 hours ago, Seals said:

I give him an A. The chipping got better as week went on. Just needs to clean up Par 5 scoring. But he has irons into them and is swinging with some aggression. Looking forward to 2018.

A+ because of my enthusiasm, but B because he's Tiger and can do so much better. He missed a lot of putts he could have made during his golden era.

 

 

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

He was impressive, no doubt.     Now if only the Golf Channel would get off their knees in front of him it would be nice.    How long will it last though, that is the question.     Looking at his swing with the speed and the posting on his left leg it could be not long before he injures his leg and Back again.    I heard them say he was scheduled for another back procedure.     

Posting the left leg, AKA locking it after/thru impact whips the club and injuries are plenty from that.    Lower back, shoulder, and knees are way too common from what the "GURUS" are teaching today.

 

 

 


Note: This thread is 2929 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.