Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3492 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

People picking up your ball, not repairing ball marks, hitting into you, jumping in front of you on the back while your putting on nine, not letting faster groups through. I realize today's society is all about looking out for yourself but I thought it would take longer to creep into golf. Guess it was wishful thinking. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Where do you play?

Bag: Titleist
Driver: TM RBZ 9.5
Fairway metals: TM RBZ 3 wood
Hybrids: TM RBZ 3, 4 and 5
Irons: TM Burner 1.0 6 thru LW stiff steel shafts
Putter: Ping B60
Ball: TM Tour Preferred X or ProV1x
Check out littlejohngolfleague.com  A Greater Houston TX traveling golf league.


  • Moderator
Posted
11 minutes ago, RickK said:

Where do you play?

Yeah, I wanna stay away from that place.  I've been pretty fortunate, I don't think I've seen any real issues anyplace I've played in the last few years.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I haven't experienced much of anything you have recently, except:

46 minutes ago, Shooting29 said:

not repairing ball marks,

I would like to see more repairing of ball marks!

Michael

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Random dummies at our course but not a daily problem or anything and it's just slow play.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, Dave2512 said:

Random dummies at our course but not a daily problem or anything and it's just slow play.

I wouldn't call what I listed a daily problem. I was just aggravated, there was obviously a group there today who didn't fix ball marks. You can look at a mark and see if its fresh and also whether the ball was relatively close and the person was just lazy. a couple Sundays ago I had a guy try to play through my group without asking while we were waiting on the group ahead. I asked him where he thought he was going to go. The problem is not the regulars. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

For a few golfers, ettiquette is not important. However, I think most golfers know what the word means, and apply it properly.

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

There are some bad apples but on total I think most golfers are considerate of others and the course.

Butch


Posted

Etiquette is not up to "par,"  and it's not just ball marks and divots.  Often I see carts way too close to greens and hardly anyone follows the 90 degree rule, when crossing a fairway on a cart.  A lot don't know enough to let fast golfers play through, either.  

Today, more folks can enjoy the game, but few have had any "training." 


Posted (edited)

The problem is that you cant see the repaired ball marks, so you have nothing to compare unrepaired with the ones that were fixed. There may have been 50 that were fixed and 5 that were not, but your perspective is that nobody fix's them.

I wish they all were but its not uncommon for me to fix three or four on a green, or fix a divot as I walk by or pick up a piece of trash blowing around the fairway. I learned that from some of the guys I played with, I hope some of the guys who have watched me, do the same. Its not a perfect world, fix what you can.

Edited by Papa Steve 55
  • Upvote 1

Posted

All that stuff is par for my courses. Yeah, it might be less than 10% of all the golfers out on a given day, but there are always some of them out.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Sheesh, I've seen the ball mark and divot thing for quite a few years, especially on shorter par 5's and par 3's where it's raining wedges and short irons to the green. I've walked up on some greens that looked like the surface of the moon! I've fixed as many as a dozen ball marks while the other members of my group putted. And this is on nice courses as well as the goat ranches.

Apparently, there are some people who can play golf quite well, but who are not "golfers" since they know nothing about the care of the green. I think that maybe golf lessons should include a few tips on etiquette and a free ball mark repair tool!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Buckeyebowman said:

Apparently, there are some people who can play golf quite well, but who are not "golfers" since they know nothing about the care of the green. I think that maybe golf lessons should include a few tips on etiquette and a free ball mark repair tool!

The irony of this has always hit me. Hacker that I am, I'll go holes at a time without even hitting the green. Then I get to look at the schmucks who did and left the ball marks. I love fixing my own ball marks.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
21 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

The irony of this has always hit me. Hacker that I am, I'll go holes at a time without even hitting the green. Then I get to look at the schmucks who did and left the ball marks. I love fixing my own ball marks.

Me too. Fixing a ball mark means I actually hit the green from some type of a distance!  It's a good feeling. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Gator Hazard said:

Me too. Fixing a ball mark means I actually hit the green from some type of a distance!  It's a good feeling. 

Not to mention how easy it is. 

Raking the bunker, on the other hand, can be a lot of work.

I use old Taylor Made clubs from eBay and golf shops.


Posted

I think it has always existed and cant say it has escalated.. well maybe the jump on the back 9 but I am guilty of that also but only when I play alone and they wont see me past the 10th hole.

  • Upvote 1

Posted

It is worse than it used to be. I belong to a private club and it's not uncommon to see;

divots not replaced....or  just dumping the mix in instead of replacing the turf

bunkers not properly raked

sand footprints on greens

golfers standing and/or moving in others peripheral vision while hitting

players not ready to hit when it's their turn

oddly enough, there isn't much of problem with repairing ball marks

I don't know if it's an educational thing or if people are just plain lazier

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I play a public course and see all these things and more.  Etiquette is a strange thing.  We know when someone else violates it but are not always aware when we break it.  We also frequently can't agree on what the rules even are.

One night, a couple years ago, I was playing as a single and caught up to another guy playing as a single.  In front of us was a twosome playing very slowly.  The guy (who had a cart) told me that he passed the twosome (who were walking) on the way to the first tee but they insisted that they get to play first because they paid first.  The guy explained that although his wife was in the cart, only he was playing and would be out of their way, etc., but the twosome was having none of that and threatened to call the clubhouse (who would have sided with the single, by the way.)  So the twosome set the pace that night.

While this guy was telling me the story, the twosome moved out of range.  He proceeds to hit his drive, say "well, have a good round" and drive off without inviting me to play with him.  I guess if he had to wait, I had to wait.

"No man goes round boasting of his vices,” he said, “except golfers." 

-- Det. Elk in The Twister by Edgar Wallace

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3492 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have a couple of trips planned, although golf was a secondary component in each.  In February we're going to visit some friends near Naples, so Mary Anne and I have added on a few days to stay and play at Streamsong.  Then In March we're going to Hawaii (again), and will almost certainly get in a few rounds there.
    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.