Jump to content
Hacker James

which club is more difficult for you?

Recommended Posts

Recently, I've been struggling with my three metal. I  went with a softer shaft and adjusted the loft to 16* and that has helped. I think my problem is I'm trying to sweep the ball and today's fairways are designed to be played with a more descending angle of approach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

5 hours ago, nevets88 said:

For me, difficulty is directly proportional to length.

Of course. Same here and I thought all of was would give an unanimous 

THE DRIVER !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interestingly, it's my 3w off the tee.  Not sure why, but I tend to get steep with it.  It's just fine off the deck...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I gave up the clubs I could not hit over the last few years which include the 3w, and 2i thru 6i, all replaced with hybrids which i can hit fairly well.  I will vote the SW when not in the sand - A full swing can be 40 - 75 yards (user error of course).  

Edited by NJpatbee
typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

15 hours ago, nevets88 said:

For me, difficulty is directly proportional to length.

Same for me as well, with the exceptions being that hybrids are easier to hit than irons. Anything longer than a 6I can be a crapshoot.

I pulled my 4H because I'm inconsistent with it but I'm absolute garbage with my 4I so I'm probably putting it back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

One observation I am making is that a lot of people (including me) seem to have trouble with low lofted irons 2-6 and are opting to go the hybrid route. I had not really hit hybrids before the last two years or so and before that, could use the 3I and 4I half way decent.  I have lost a LOT of distance over the past 18 months and started using the hybrids which helped a lot.

In practice sessions at home, I can hit a 4 iron with little difficulty, but out on the course I am hesitant to try it. I am starting to believe that maybe I should start using those low lofted irons and gain confidence back.  I dunno....age and time are taking their tolls and I am having to recalibrate distances.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I've been hot and cold this season with fairway woods. Some days I will hit them solidly, other days its low, hot shots that go maybe 160 yards... Related to gauging in set-up shere swing will bottom out. Particularly aggravating: If I have a solid drive on a Par 5 from an elevated tee, I end up only 200 yards from the green. Then, I flub the FW shot.

SW from greenside bunkers also a problem. Practice bunkers at course that don't drain well, plus they fall under sprinkler arc. Sometimes I go down to ninth green late in day to practice off of dry sand. I tend to have good weeks and bad weeks from bunker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

15 minutes ago, Hacker James said:

One observation I am making is that a lot of people (including me) seem to have trouble with low lofted irons 2-6 and are opting to go the hybrid route. I had not really hit hybrids before the last two years or so and before that, could use the 3I and 4I half way decent.  I have lost a LOT of distance over the past 18 months and started using the hybrids which helped a lot.

In practice sessions at home, I can hit a 4 iron with little difficulty, but out on the course I am hesitant to try it. I am starting to believe that maybe I should start using those low lofted irons and gain confidence back.  I dunno....age and time are taking their tolls and I am having to recalibrate distances.

Some where above I posted about my poor 5W issues. However, I have an old 2i that works quite well for me. It just works with my swing. 

I have gone through that older age, distance loss scenario. Still going through it. I will tack on another birthday next month. More candles equals less yards, and more strokes. Still using the same old swing. Just using different clubs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

@Patch  on the age/distance thing, it becomes exponentially more prevalent after age 70.  I am learning to overcome and improvise, but the "body won't do what the mind recalls" thing is a matter of acceptance I guess.   I will break 80 again, but time is running out. I've come close twice this year.   75 yrs and counting....  now where did I hide that four iron?....

Edited by Hacker James

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

18 hours ago, nevets88 said:

For me, difficulty is directly proportional to length.

Another +1 here.  My exception is the driver which I’d say is about the same difficulty as 6 iron.  That puts 3 wood as the #1 handicap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Hacker James said:

@Patch  on the age/distance thing, it becomes exponentially more prevalent after age 70.  I am learning to overcome and improvise, but the "body won't do what the mind recalls" thing is a matter of acceptance I guess.   I will break 80 again, but time is running out. I've come close twice this year.   75 yrs and counting....  now where did I hide that four iron?....

 

I want to live to be a 100 so I can shoot my age. :-P

80 +/-  is also my target score when I play. Some days are better than others. Better when I don't have to pull my 5W. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

22 hours ago, nevets88 said:

For me, difficulty is directly proportional to length.

Same. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 iron is the most difficult for me.  It's the longest iron I carry.  I can't hit it at all.  It's baffling.  I wonder, what am I doing with the clubs that I can hit, that I am not doing with the 6 iron?  I'm going to have to get a lesson from a pro, because my efforts with my 6 iron are really pathetic. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

For me, besides the recent couple weeks of fit with the 3w and 5w and which seem to be fixed now, it's undoubtedly the 4 iron from the deck (anywhere but from the tee), even in a flat fairway lie.

For some reason, all my previous sets had a 4H and I decided to "try" a true 4i with my latest set, a year old now. I can hit it fine slightly teed up, but not with any kind of confidence from the ground...

In second place is a wedge with a full swing, whether the 56 or 60 or even the 50 gap wedge that's part of the iron set. I'll do 1/2 to 3/4, flighted down for the most part, and feel like a rank beginner if I attempt a full swing with them...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

30 minutes ago, sjduffers said:

For me, besides the recent couple weeks of fit with the 3w and 5w and which seem to be fixed now, it's undoubtedly the 4 iron from the deck (anywhere but from the tee), even in a flat fairway lie.

For some reason, all my previous sets had a 4H and I decided to "try" a true 4i with my latest set, a year old now. I can hit it fine slightly teed up, but not with any kind of confidence from the ground...

In second place is a wedge with a full swing, whether the 56 or 60 or even the 50 gap wedge that's part of the iron set. I'll do 1/2 to 3/4, flighted down for the most part, and feel like a rank beginner if I attempt a full swing with them...

You gotta realize that your 4 iron is like an old school 2 or 3 iron...like hitting a pinball with a moving brick wall...maybe firm your left wrist and drag it through the swing..delaying the release really until your left arm is parallel with your left thigh...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me its 3W anywhere other then the Tee Box....no issues at all using it on the Tee but when needed in the fairway it's 50/50 for me,  I know it's a mental thing for me and this season I made it priority #1 to use it more and I have (and with better results) but still not the club of choice in a serious round  lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 wood off the turf, and lob wedge. I have never hit a mediocre shot with a lob wedge. It's either good, or terrible. The 3wood is good off the tee, but the 5wood is my choice off the turf.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • I know  for myself as a golf fan I want to be able to watch golf and have it entertain me.  There's really only three tournaments anymore I pay attention to Masters British and US Open.  The last couple years the US has been a dud but I keep watching hoping it will once again become the ultimate test. I want to see the best quality golf.  I think that's where this whole discussion of distance comes in.  Nicklaus Snead et all for the most part could swing much faster than they did.  Sometimes they would bash one but not usually.  Hogan did some long drive stuff at times early on and he was puttin the wood to it espescially for his height.  In order to score best these guys played a golf swing that was not maxed out because the ball spun so much that slight misfits were truly bad you had to manage the strike just right at high speed to keep spin down and get the launch right or it would be an embarrassing balloon ballflight.   They were playing the game of skill not the game of maximum speed alone.  Very self disciplined approach.  It kinda makes me mad when I hear younger folks say "part of the reason for the distance now is that players understand launch conditions better" Really?  To me it's preposterous to try to assert that modern players only in the last few years learned launch conditions.  It's also arrogant and incorrect.  Like gear effect also.  Heel low cuts and toe draws were shots people practiced with balata back to Jackie Burke! THE BALATA PLAYERS WERE MASTERS OF SPIN COMPARED TO THE GUYS NOW!  TO SAY THAT THEY DID NOT KNOW WHAT THEY WERE DOING IS ABSOLUTELY VERY VERY INSULTING TO THEM AND ANYONE WHO IS CONNECTED WITH THEM!   They were masters because the higher spinning ball gave them much better feedback while developing their swings.  You have to know how to create certain launch conditions to get that balata out there like Norman or Nicklaus or whoever.  Maybe they did not know their numbers on Doppler but they ALL knew who could do it and who couldn't and more I,portent how THEY did it.  Now they are all bashing it because there's no reason not to.  The ball  doesn't spin as much and the clubs are forgiving.  The courses are setup so that being in the 'rough' is better than the fairway. You get brain dead robots like DJ out there hitting miles.  Where's the variation and challenge?  Where are the courses made to challenge the modern technology?  It's not good for the tour to make the game into a distance contest.  They are marketing the thing poorly and results have been showing and will show the next few years as more and more courses close. Golf with a higher spinning ball would be so cool to even watch on tv with shot tracer.   I think with a game focused on power and distance over self control and skill you get a bore.  With most tour stops it's like watching a Ferrari F1 car racing a guy in a Prius.  (The Prius being the course.) A golfer with the skill of Corey Pavin simply couldn't make it today and that's sad.  Guy was a great competitor striker of the ball.  He was shaping fw wood shots into greens.  You don't see that stuff anymore and really the younger crowd doesn't know what they don't know.   To me the whole game of golf boils down to decisions and self knowledge and control and is made more interesting the more difficult the course gets.   With the modern week to week game with older courses and modern clubs it's basically a free minus six or more every week due to par fives alone for a good touring pro. This is a long rant to forgive me.  I just wish golf were more entertaining now.  It's largely not.  I'd like to see the pros have to face the challenge of a higher spinning ball and takeaway Some for and max volume on drivers and fw clubs.  The reason for this is I want to see what kind of level mankind can reach in this game.  I want to see the best quality.  IMO the way the game is goin is wrong for that.  It's a putting contest now.  They all bash it they all hit greens it's just who gets a hot putter. I wanna make it more challenging and truly separate the wheat from the chaff.  To me that would be more interesting. Or we can just leave things as they are and really never know what a great golfer is truly capable of because the game now really doesn't require that skill anymore.  Heck just carry a driver some short irons and wedges and a putter.   Sorry for the rant but many of us get angry when it's said that modern players have been taught new things by trackman.  Sorry guys,  equal some Nicklaus or Hogan or Knudson et all scores with balata then you can talk.  That's real feedback hit ball watch ball.  Ball no do what you want do something else! Happy Holidays!      
    • One thing I like about our semi-private course is that everyone is very friendly and welcoming. Our seniors group is fun to play with, although they sometimes forget that I'm one of the unretired! and have to go to work most days. The course is a Nicklaus design with lots of challenging holes. The drawback is that the developer envisioned Winged Foot Way Out West, sporting a private-equity membership with everyone living in $400,000 homes. Thus, he contracted for an extremely difficult course with lots of bunkers. Legend has it that Nicklaus cautioned the developer against going overboard on the difficulty of holes, and the complexity of the bunkering (as in high maintenance costs). Well, much less $$ showed up than was forecast, and the developer was forced to sell. Fast forward, the greens crew has had a rough job in recent years trying to keep the bunkers in repair. A few pits have been removed as they settled out oddly, or ended up permanently flooded.  But, those remaining really keep the greens crew busy. We just don't have a Winged Foot maintenance budget. One other drawback: the driving range is at the top of a sloping hill, so it's a bit had to determine your true club carries because you're hitting down hill. Overall, I really like the course, the crew and the members.
    • Welcome back then!    This thread has helped me twice get my head back on straight when returning to golf from a stoppage.  I hope it works wonders for you too. By the way, I'm not even convinced that your shot from the bunker was a bad one.  The issue at our level isn't "would a shot with this result make SportsCenter if I were in a pro event?" but rather "did I raise or lower my expected strokes remaining from this spot?" So, if you were short sided in the bunker and holed out, hey, great shot.  But if you were short sided and blasted out to the green and two-putted, there's a pretty decent chances you saved yourself some strokes right there with the bunker shot -- because it's probably an expected value over 3 for an average someone of your skill level to get down from there.
    • Is there an option for irregular?  I still haven't gotten to the point where I can look at a bunker lie and figure out with good regularity if there's sand underneath the ball.  When there is, but there isn't too much (so I guess I don't like "too soft"?) under it, I hit decently good sand shots.  Not "I'm always going to make the save" shots, but enough that I'm confident I'll hit it to within a likely two putt -- something I'm just fine with.
    • I have G400 irons and paid under $700 for six of them (5-P).  I am debating going to go back in a few days and get the UW as well, and I don't expect that to cost much more than $125.  Where are you that MAP is this much?  I bought mine at Roger Dunn and you can bet they follow Ping's rules to the letter.
  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. DeadMan
      DeadMan
      (31 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.