Jump to content
iacas

Do You Play the Correct Tees?

Correct Tees?  

132 members have voted

  1. 1. Per the chart in the first post, do you typically play the "correct tees" for your driver carry yardage?

    • Yes, I do.
      91
    • No, I play shorter tees.
      22
    • No, I play longer tees.
      19
  2. 2. In your estimation, what percentage of golfers play tees too long for them?

    • 0-15%
      3
    • 16-30%
      18
    • 31-50%
      33
    • 51-70%
      45
    • 71-85%
      29
    • 86-100%
      4


93 posts / 9999 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

 

1 hour ago, cutchemist42 said:

Thats an interesting way to view it, never thought of truly WHERE the extra yards are coming from.

For my future course when I move (I've played it before)  I'll be playing the Blues.

http://www.dakotadunes.ca/wp-content/uploads/ScorecardInside.jpg

 

Yard increase will be fairly uniform for par3s which I like. Main difference being 50/80 yards added to 2 par4s.

 

Yeah I like that way more. Make 1 par 3 way harder (7i to 4i or 19˚ for me), some others maybe one club more, and then make a couple of the 4s and 5s a lot more challenging, while keeping some of them the same.  Creates more variety in the holes.

 

1 hour ago, rehmwa said:

Lots of courses around here where the Par 3's at 6200 yards might be:  120, 150, 160, and 205

yet the 6600+ would line up as:  185, 185, 190, 210

...

(:-D  yes, I realize I'm admitting I sometimes choose which tees I play based on how badly they might make me whine about the holes.....)

 

Exactly.  I've even played some courses where the par 3s from the shorter tees would be 4 different clubs, then from the longer tees it's 200, 204, 205, 215.  I've seen that poor course design from shorter tees too, though less frequently, where it's something like 3 9i holes plus one other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Missouri Swede said:

But isn't that the point?  That is a reason they shouldn't be playing those tees.

It drives me nuts because they are taking too long not because they can't carry the hazard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm answering this for only the long courses.  It doesn't make sense to me to include short courses where I can't even decide to play "too long" tee boxes.  I mostly play a short executive course that is about 3,100.  2nd most often course is Torrey Pines which both courses are long.  So this is pretty much about when I play Torrey.

I choose 71 to 85% play from tee boxes that are too long based on the chart.   I choose that I usual play tees that are too long. 

I usually play from the white tees (= green tees on Torrey North 6,346, there are five tee boxes, the greens are the middle ones), I carry about 210 with driver, roll out to 230 to 250. I'm longer than the majority of the people I play with who usually want to play the same tee boxes.

I don't agree with the tee box chart.  So what if I have to hit 3 hybrid after a really good drive to reach the longest par four.  Why is that a problem?  (I still play almost always faster than the course pace, walking)

Edited by No Mulligans

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The tee box distances are mostly for pace of play, so if you’re fast anyway no one will say anything.

The only thing is your scores could suffer a bit. I wonder if there’s a study that includes driving distance and GIR? Indirectly, we can look at handicap vs driving distance and handicap versus GIR but I didn’t find anything so far. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

17 hours ago, NM Golf said:

I have told this story before on here but on the Bear Course at the Grand Traverse Resort in Michigan you couldn't play the back tees unless you could prove your handicap was low enough. Even then the starter watched me hit my first tee shot before he let me play them. I don't know if they still do that, but it was nice to see at the time. On a separate note, that course was tough as nails from those tees, and anyone short of a long hitting scratch golfer had no business on them. Hell, I probably had no business on them myself.

I talked to a co-worker who plays that course. Apparently they still enforce the policy. He said the fairways are wide but the greens are smaller and very difficult.

I'd like to play that course some day but even the white tees look too difficult for my game.

5a1d431eb11d0_ScreenShot2017-11-28at5_59_32AM.thumb.png.e6eec8c55381039946f489b65bdeadeb.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Great topic guys! Everyone that is male in the state of OH plays from the tips it feels like sometimes... I really think if we could get people to play based on handicap or carry distance (of course everyone claims to drive 300 yards too) it was greatly help pace of play. 

Somehow the red tees became “ladies tees” and I think that can be a huge problem in Time it takes to play a round! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, JonMA1 said:

I talked to a co-worker who plays that course. Apparently they still enforce the policy. He said the fairways are wide but the greens are smaller and very difficult.

I'd like to play that course some day but even the white tees look too difficult for my game.

5a1d431eb11d0_ScreenShot2017-11-28at5_59_32AM.thumb.png.e6eec8c55381039946f489b65bdeadeb.png

 

Yellow/White or Yellow look playable by a higher handicap.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 minutes ago, clutchshot said:

 

Somehow the red tees became “ladies tees” and I think that can be a huge problem in Time it takes to play a round! 

I think the "Ladies Tees" title on the scorecard is a big problem.   One course I play often has 4 sets of tees: blue, black, white, and red, with the red being the ladies tees, and lots of us older gents play from the whites.  But on the other course I play often, there are 3 sets of tees, Blue, white, and red/black, with red/black being the combined senior/ladies tees,and none of the men seem to want to play from those tees. 

I know it's just ego, but men, even senior men, don't want to play from the ladies' tees.  

Another problem is when they do have separate forward (or senior) tees and ladies' tees, but they put the senior tees so far forward it's ridiculous.  Sometimes there's 100 yards between the 2nd set of tees and the 3rd set of tees.  I've played courses where we started out playing what they call the senior tees, and by the 3rd hole we are saying, this is ridiculous, these tees are for the 90 year olds, let's move back.  There has to be some even spacing between the sets of tees. 

 

Edited by Marty2019

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I voted yes, regarding using the correct tees.  I play anywhere between 5700-6100 yards regularly.  As for the chart, my driver yardages line up with white, but all my other clubs tend to line up with purple.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 hours ago, JonMA1 said:

I talked to a co-worker who plays that course. Apparently they still enforce the policy. He said the fairways are wide but the greens are smaller and very difficult.

I'd like to play that course some day but even the white tees look too difficult for my game.

5a1d431eb11d0_ScreenShot2017-11-28at5_59_32AM.thumb.png.e6eec8c55381039946f489b65bdeadeb.png

 

Its a typical Nicklaus course, his courses tend to be forgiving off the tee but demanding into the green. He also seems to put a premium on being on the correct side of the fairway. I have really enjoyed every Nicklaus course I have ever played and the Bear was no exception. Probably the toughest of his courses I have played, but its very fair. I played really well and shot in the high 70's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I guess by that chart i play the correct tees. But i don't think raw distance is the only determiner. I played with a older local pga pro in the state open years back (bill britton i think his name was) and that dude barley hit the ball 250 with a driver. I was driving the ball 25 or more yards past him on every driver hole and he still crushed me by 15 shots on a 7100 yard course. Think he was 2 or 3 under after 36. Guy was stinging hybrids and 5 woods like they were 9 irons...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's interesting that according to the polls, 85% on this site believe that they play tees that are appropriate, or even shorter than they should...

...but over 90% believe that between 30% and 100% of other golfers play tees that are too long for them.

;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I voted "yes" for Q1, and "31-50%" for Q2.

I'm a high-purple to low-red on the distance chart.  At my home club, I typically play down just a little relative to what's on the chart -- my tees are right around 6,000yds.  I do this because our course is very narrow, with deep bermuda rough, and very tough around the greens; so the back tees (6500-6600yds) are too much for me at this particular course.  We do have combo tees that play ~6275ish, which is right in my preferred range; sometimes I play those, but mostly I just keep it simple.

When playing other courses, I look for tees in the 6250-6300 range.  Anything below 6100 feels way too short (too many wedge approaches on p4s).  I've played up to 6650 and scored well -- just need the course to not be overly penal with width, forced carries, etc.  Anything over that is just too much for my current skill level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

17 minutes ago, David in FL said:

It's interesting that according to the polls, 85% on this site believe that they play tees that are appropriate, or even shorter than they should...

...but over 90% believe that between 30% and 100% of other golfers play tees that are too long for them.

;-)

I think most people on this site are more aware of their actual distances so are more reluctant to play tees that they know are too long for them. 

I think the people on this site that voted for other golfers playing tees that are too long for them probably have a similar reason that I have as to why I think the majority of golfers play from tees that are too long:

Since it seems like the majority of golfers overestimate the distance they actually hit each club, its not surprising that they also choose longer tees to correspond to that inflated distance. 

Example, if you're playing with someone who says they consistently carry it 280, but in reality only 1 drive per round goes that far, then since that golfer truly believes he drives 280, they think they should be playing 7000+ yard tees, where in reality they are probably more suited for 6500 yds

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

20 minutes ago, David in FL said:

It's interesting that according to the polls, 85% on this site believe that they play tees that are appropriate, or even shorter than they should...

...but over 90% believe that between 30% and 100% of other golfers play tees that are too long for them.

;-)

I attribute this to the fact that people on this site are more educated about playing it forward, since we were repeatedly told to do so by people such as yourself. :-D

Seriously though, most of the people I know do play the correct tees, but often times random people I get paired with almost never hit a green because they're too far. I carry a bit less than 260 if the shot doesn't hit a tree first, but often play 6000-6400 yards because my current skill level kind of demands that I do. Most of my playing partners play there to keep me company, but they also like playing there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Kind of an interesting answer for me.  I voted that I play the correct tees, but that is not necessarily true.  But, I felt like the questions were geared towards whether or not you are playing from tees too long for you.  

I carry the ball, with my Driver, about 250-260.   Rolling out to about 260-275.   But I typically play 6100-6400 yard tees.  

I may have the driver distance to play at 6800, but too many other parts of my game (specifically accuracy and consistency with long irons), holds me back from being comfortable at those yardages.   
If I can't hold a handicap under 8, i feel I have no business moving my tees back.  

 

Edited by lastings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I´m currently hitting 260 yards carry. (15/20 roll). So i´m in the middle of Red and PGA Tour tees. I should play 7100 yard courses but the back tees of my home course are just 6550 yards. I almost reach in 2 all the par 5 and hit a lot of Driver / Wedge on many par 4´s. I only play longer courses on national championships 10 times a year. That´s where i suffer hitting long irons to greens on Par 3/4.

Voted Shorter and 80%

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I voted yes on the first one.

I am between white and purple. The two courses I play most often are 5959 and 6338 on the card from the tees I use, but the markers aren't usually at the full yardage. The longer course is fairly open and plays a little shorter than the card indicates.

The longer course is a college course, and I see a lot of young guys  playing from the tips (7035 yards) that shouldn't. Oh to be young again!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Affiliates

    SuperSpeed
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo
  • Posts

    • I recently asked @mvmac, who was familiar with what Dave and I taught, to give us a report card on what advanced players are learning from advanced coaches and how he felt we stood. Mike hasn't seen us teach much in the past four or five years, and we haven't put out a lot of videos (aside from these, of course) lately, either. So some of the things he thinks we teach date back five years or more. Before I get into the list… you're going to quickly see that most of the list is "for better players." I'll make a conscious decision a lot of the time to decide which of two slightly different directions to go. For example, some people here on TST were surprised by the "flow" talk we've had the past several months here on TST. I'll admit to getting people to "create space from the wall" by learning a very centered to even slightly forward-of-center hip pivot (heck, I still give this drill to students), but these are golfers > 6 handicappers (often > 10) who sway their hips back a lot. For them, going a little extreme to this side of things is a conscious choice by me to help their ballstriking. For better players, I talk about more "flow" stuff. I let the right hip look like it moves back an inch or so. The way I talk about a lot of things is a little different. I don't teach "one swing" but I do have one general system of what I think is right, but within that, I have preferences for different types of players. The player who is an 18 who wants to become a 10 and won't really spend a lot of time practicing gets something different than the motivated 6 handicapper trying to become scratch. That all said, the list, and my reactions to it. For Most Players… … I wouldn’t change much, little reverse K setup, err with a stronger grip, Bender/Geoff Jones style pivot with some feet flare, don’t be afraid to get speedy with the arms coming down. So, this is what I talked about up above. For most players — and for us sometimes that's 90% of the people we teach — the simple, very centered, slightly less dynamic pivot stuff he's saying is still pretty good. Again, not much time spent here, so let's move on to the finer details. My text will remain in black. For Better Players… … I don’t know if I would call these changes to what you do but how I would go about teaching better players. Changes in my view from several years ago. In no particular order: Foot Flare No more than 20 degrees of foot flare, even less on trail foot. I understand the reasoning for this, and I'll still add some foot flare to the trail foot for an older good player to help increase range of motion, but I think the gains here are so small that this starts to "matter" (still only a little) to scratch golfers or better. But, maybe there's something to learn here… Hips/Pelvis Pelvis more level or even slight LPT at 1 Avoid idea or image of hip slide I think I get a check mark here. I talk with even mid-level handicap players lately about "landing" on the front foot, which includes a little "flow" back toward the target with the upper body. Even higher handicappers, while I'm emphasizing "getting forward" (great players still get their weight AND pressure forward - the images in the "hip slide" topic aren't "wrong") the hips getting forward, I talk a lot about "sending energy" forward. Hands A1-A2 Little or no depth with the hands to 2 or even feeling forearm counter rotation in takeaway for players that bank the club inward. From DL, the "curve" of the "hula hoop" is basically negligible in the direction of "depth from A1-A2, so what appears to be "straight back. A2 depends on how quickly a player hinges the club, of course, but most good players have a pretty narrow range here. I probably allow a little more hand depth than Mike would like, but often I feel that's a matter of other things being a priority. I like to see the hands go slightly inward the first half of the backswing while the latter half becomes about more "ascent," but even then a lot of that "slightly" is after 1.75 or so. As a brief aside, I think my own swing is shaping up in this regard nicely. I'd get too shallow, too low, and my wrists would react poorly at the top given what I'd done to get there. I now feel like my hands go out away from me from A1-A2.5, but of course they don't actually. As for the counter-rotation, I'll have Mike clarify perhaps, as we've taught this to even poorer players. The feeling that the right hand stays "on top" a bit longer is very helpful in not swinging the clubhead well behind the player, and in keeping the face a bit "squarer" (or at least not flopping it open) longer. "Stretching" the Trail Side Stretching the trail side without elevating the rib cage I get what he's saying, and it's something I work on myself as well. I'll "stand up" a little too much during the backswing. The feel for me is from the top of the right thigh up across my pelvis and just above my belly button, but the rib cage as Mike says doesn't stretch up. S&T teaches you to feel the stretch further up, up the whole right side, and again for higher handicappers we'll let their hips turn (trail leg extends a good bit) and they'll feel the stretch all the way up, but for lower handicappers, we don't do that quite so much this way. Lead Side Unweighting Unweighting lead side early. That could lead to a trigger move or a slight pelvis bump or a little pressure “rock” to the trail side before the club/hands move back.  But doesn’t has to. I teach this, and in looking at a few videos of some of Dave's better players, he does too. Mike's right that we didn't as much seven years ago, but the pressure data we were early at looking at led to small changes here. Trail Knee Extension Avoid a lot of trail knee extension from 1-3 Ha, addressed above, before I got to this point. We don't teach a lot of this here. Unlike George Gankas. 🙂 At any rate, for a lower handicapper who lacks some range of motion (an older good player), we might let them get away with more trail knee extension, and to be clear the trail knee still extends measurably. Elbows Close Avoid squeezing the arms together at 1 or in the backswing. Hate this one myself. I've been saying for years that squeezing the elbows together during the backswing is almost the surest way to have them come apart during the downswing. Banking the Trail Foot Avoid trying to bank the trail foot, allow heel to come off the ground by 6 Check. I know why Mike added this - a lot of poor players, and a lot of juniors, will shoot their trail knee toward the ball early in the downswing and the heel will come off the ground VERY early. But I looked back at the lessons of my good players, and the notes, and I've not mentioned the trail foot banking in at least several years. And though admittedly I don't have many Justin Thomas type players… I do let people get away with some more of the "knee action" described above with the driver than with irons. Like JT himself. Stopping at A4 Avoid stopping or rehearsing 4. Pending more information, I don't know that I'll agree here, and I might humbly suggest that because what Mike has been working on, he's seeing this as limiting "flow" and the general athletic movement. On that I'd agree, but sometimes stopping at A4 is a good way to check on something that happened from 2-4 or something. Or if I have someone who is across the line and who dumps it under from there, and they're working on not only getting more "laid off" (feeling only) so the club can pitch out a little (paging @saevel25), it can be useful, IMO, to isolate just that piece starting from the proper spot, so you know it's the proper spot. Fast Backswing Fast backswing via body is good. I might be missing something here, too, as we've talked about speeding up the backswing for awhile now. It's even in LSW, and was "old" when we put it in there. Maybe the bit I'm missing is "via body" but I don't feel that way. Two Random Bits Have concepts for the downswing/impact but train the backswing. Understand that a lot that is occurring with the club/limbs/wrist angles is being heavily influenced by the torso/pelvis motion. These are a bit more philosophical, so, I can't really comment concretely here. We work on a lot of backswings, and since the arms are attached to the shoulders, of course a lot of what they do is governed by how their being "flung." And Mike won't deny that sometimes the downswing is what needs the work. I'll make edits as needed, or comment in posts further down the stream, but I'd like to thank Mike for taking the time to comment. I think we/I graded out pretty well, and if nothing else, I think maybe I'll do more to share and talk about some more advanced player "stuff" in the coming weeks, months, years.
    • Bifurcation.  Touring pros play the dimpleless ball.  The rest of us mortals play a ball with dimples and outdrive the pros... with our 7 irons.
    • It's more a matter of the Grint kind of having a bug in how they're calculating some things, I think.
    • I don't particularly want to change bounces. Right now my low end gapping is 130 for 9i, 120 for PW, 100 for GW. Looking for 1 degree weaker PW to make it closer to 115 (I know this isn't ideal or perfect but that was my thought). I also tend to hit my Vokeys better than my AP2s which is why I was maybe looking at a 48 degree Vokey.
    • Had pretty rough front nine today with my swing thoughts. Took one beer after the nine and decided to just let go on back nine and things got way better, bombed all drives and wedges were good. Just 2 birdies tho of which this hole 18 one was tasty as I've been struggling with this before. We had quite heavy headwind and I joked with one guy in our group that I'll offer him a beer if he gets it on the green with 2 shots, he made a meal offer in exchange. Althought this plays only 516 yards from the yellow tees, I feel into the headwind we had it's nearly impossible to get there in 2 with my distances, because there's so much elevation towards green. Hit a really good drive that penetrated throught the wind quite nice being aprox 260-270 yards long. Usually don't hit 3 wood off the fairways since it's quite wild for me, but decided to go for it. Instead of killing it and trying to go for green in hopes of free meal, I hit one little easier over the trees on left side and ended up in good spot for a little wedge. Hit the wedge slightly heavy from a uphill lie and it ended up being ~10 feet short. Did sink the putt which had bit right to left break, patted myself on the back for having the self control to not attack the green. After sauna and that birdie the meal tasted amazing even thought I paid it myself. 😄  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. AbsoluteTruths
      AbsoluteTruths
      (61 years old)
    2. coop6
      coop6
      (34 years old)
    3. DJYoshi
      DJYoshi
      (39 years old)
    4. GinetteQuiroz
      GinetteQuiroz
      (34 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...